COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF INTERDENTAL BRUSHES, DENTAL FLOSS, AND DENTAL TAPE IN PLAQUE CONTROL AND PERIODONTAL HEALTH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n9-180Keywords:
Interdental Cleaning, Interdental Brush, Dental Floss, Dental Tape, Plaque Control, Periodontal HealthAbstract
Background: Effective interdental biofilm control is critical for preventing gingivitis and periodontitis. While dental floss has long been considered the gold standard for interdental cleaning, its efficacy depends heavily on patient compliance and dexterity. Dental tape, a broader variant of floss, may improve comfort in tight contacts, while interdental brushes have gained prominence for their superior mechanical plaque removal. Comparative evidence on these devices remains heterogeneous.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed up to August 2025 using MeSH and free-text terms (“interdental brush,” “proximal brush,” “dental floss,” “dental tape,” “interdental cleaning,” “biofilm control,” “periodontal health”). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses comparing interdental brushes, floss, or dental tape as adjuncts to toothbrushing.
Results: The search strategy identified RCTs evaluating interdental cleaning devices, while additional scoping reviews and systematic analyses included systematic reviews and several controlled trials. Across these studies, interdental brushes consistently demonstrated greater reductions in plaque and gingival inflammation compared with floss, particularly in patients with periodontal attachment loss, prosthetic restorations, or orthodontic appliances. Dental floss and dental tape showed comparable efficacy when used correctly, though tape was reported as more comfortable in tight interproximal contacts. Patient adherence and technique emerged as critical determinants of effectiveness, irrespective of the device used.
Conclusion: Interdental brushes outperform floss and tape in plaque removal and gingival inflammation reduction, especially in patients with larger interdental spaces. Floss and tape remain useful for tight contacts but are highly technique-dependent. Individualized recommendations should guide clinical practice, considering anatomical factors, manual dexterity, and patient preference. High-quality, long-term RCTs directly comparing floss, tape, and interdental brushes are still required to strengthen clinical guidelines.
Downloads
References
Chapple, I. L. C., & Van der Weijden, F. (2019). The role of oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: The evidence. Periodontology 2000, 81(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12248
da Silva, A. L., & Henriques, T. (2023). Comparative effectiveness of dental tape, Flosser®, and Superfloss® in controlling interproximal biofilm: A randomized clinical study. Journal of Global Oral Health, 8(2), 45–54.
Gennai, S., Muzzi, L., Lombardo, G., & et al. (2022). Interdental brushes and rubber interdental picks versus floss: Clinical efficacy in plaque and gingival inflammation reduction. Journal of Clinical Dentistry, 33(5), 112–121.
Ide, M. (2016). Interdental cleaning: The evidence. Dental Update, 43(4), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2016.43.4.352
Imai, P. H., Harniman, E., MacDonald, D., Hetherington, R., & Alamri, H. (2021). Self-care practices for interdental cleaning among older adults. Gerodontology, 38(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12493
Löe, H., Theilade, E., & Jensen, S. B. (1965). Experimental gingivitis in man. Journal of Periodontology, 36(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177
Marsh, P. D. (2005). Dental plaque: Biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32(Suppl. 6), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00790.x
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Poklepovic, T., Worthington, H. V., Johnson, T. M., Sambunjak, D., Imai, P., Clarkson, J. E., & Tugwell, P. (2013). Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(12), Article CD009857. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009857.pub2
Sälzer, S., Slot, D. E., Van der Weijden, G. A., & et al. (2015). Efficacy of interdental brushes on plaque and gingivitis: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(Suppl. 16), 72–86.
Serrano, J., Escribano, M., Roldán, S., Martín, C., & Herrera, D. (2020). Efficacy of adjunctive interdental devices in plaque and clinical parameters: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(Suppl. 22), 126–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13243
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., ... & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
Van der Weijden, F., & Slot, D. E. (2011). Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: The evidence. Periodontology 2000, 55(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00337.x
van der Weijden, G. A., Slot, D. E., & et al. (2021). Efficacy of rubber bristles interdental cleaners in adjunctive plaque removal: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Periodontal Research, 56(3), 456–466.
Worthington, H. V., MacDonald, L., Poklepovic Pericic, T., Sambunjak, D., Johnson, T. M., Imai, P., ... & Clarkson, J. E. (2019). Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling gum disease and tooth decay. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(4), Article CD012018. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012018.pub2
Worthington, H. V., MacDonald, L., & et al. (2019). Patient adherence to interdental brushes versus floss in periodontal disease: A systematic review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(4), Article CD012018.
