THE INFLUENCE OF CURING LIGHT TIP DISTANCE ON THE HARDNESS OF RESTORATIONS

Authors

  • Andrely Carolyne Oliveira dos Santos Author
  • Maria Clara de Arruda Gomes Author
  • Lucas Rodrigues dos Santos Author
  • Laís Torreão de Souza Leão Author
  • Maria Sabrina dos Santos Lima Author
  • Thamyres Paloma Silva de Moura Author
  • Juliana Raposo Souto Maior Author
  • Mirella Emerenciano Massa Lima Author
  • Alexandre Batista Lopes do Nascimento Author
  • Renata Pedrosa Guimarães Author
  • Hilcia Mezzalira Teixeira Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n5-116

Keywords:

Composite Resin, Microhardness, Light Curing Unit

Abstract

Introduction: The conversion of monomer into polymer during photopolymerization is essential for the durability of composite resin. External factors, such as the distance of the curing light tip, can affect the efficiency of the process, reducing the material's microhardness and its mechanical properties. Objective: To evaluate the influence of the light source distance on the intensity of a curing unit and its effect on the microhardness of a composite resin. Materials and Methods: The distance between the light source and the resin was standardized using an acrylic matrix (0mm, 6mm, and 8mm). A total of 30 samples (4mm x 6mm) were fabricated using the nano-hybrid composite resin Spectro Smart (Dentsply) with a metal mold and were polymerized for 40s only on the upper portion of the samples. After photopolymerization, the samples underwent a Vickers microhardness test, with three surface and three basal indentations performed, and the mean value was calculated. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Sidak’s test. Results: There was no significant difference in microhardness in the top region (p > 0.05), regardless of the curing light distance. However, the hardness in depth showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05), which increased as the distance of the curing light tip increased (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The resin surface received sufficient energy for proper polymerization; however, there was a progressive reduction in microhardness in the deeper layers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aguiar FHB, Braceiro A, Lima DANL, Ambrosano GMB, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing tip distance and resin shade on microhardness of a hybrid resin composite. Braz Oral Res., 2005;19(4):302-6.

2. Catelan A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GMB, Lobo T, Aguiar FH. Impact of the distance of light curing on the degree of conversion and microhardness of a composite resin. Acta Odontol Scand., 2015;73(4):298-301.

3. Damasceno RF, Almeida M, Costa G, Costa E, Lima D. Efeito da saturação de cor na profundidade de polimerização de resina composta nanohíbrida. Rev Eletrônica Acervo Saúde., 2020;(42):e2875.

4. Zain AO, Marghalani HY. Influence of light-curing distances on microflexural strength of two resin-based composites. Oper Dent., 2020;45(3):297-305.

5. Frank L, Al-Maawi S, Schmitt C, Elsner T, Schmidt S. Effect of acid challenge and photoactivation distance on microhardness and roughness of flow bulk-fill composite resins. Rev Odontol UNESP., 2022;51:e20220013.

6. Al-Zain AO, Platt JA. Effect of light-curing distance and curing time on composite microflexural strength. Dent Mater J., 2021;40(1):202-8.

7. Aung SZ, Hoshino M, Sato K, Aoki T, Taira Y. The effect of different light curing units on Vickers microhardness and degree of conversion of flowable resin composites. Dent Mater J., 2021;40(1):44-51.

8. Daugherty MM, Hsu SM, Sinha S, et al. Effect of high-intensity curing lights on the polymerization of bulk-fill composites. Dent Mater., 2018;34(10):1531-41.

9. Yap AUJ, Pandya M, Toh WS. Depth of cure of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater J., 2016;35(3):503-10.

10. Yoshida K, Meng X. Influence of light-exposure methods and depths of cavity on the microhardness of dual-cured core build-up resin composites. J Appl Oral Sci., 2014;22:44-51.

11. Ilie N, Kreppel I, Durner J. Effect of radical amplified photopolymerization (RAP) in resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig., 2014;18:1081-8.

12. Baggio R, Fernandes A, Souza B, et al. Influência da distância da ponta do fotopolimerizador nas propriedades da resina composta. Publicatio UEPG: Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde., 2008;14(2):31-7.

13. Al Shaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin-based composites: A literature review. Saudi Dent J., 2017;29(2):48-58.

14. Zhu S, Platt J. Curing efficiency of three different curing modes at different distances for four composites. Oper Dent., 2011;36(4):362-71.

15. Rode KM, Kawano Y, Turbino ML. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent., 2007;32(6):571-8. 16. Bennett AW, Watts DC. Performance of two blue light-emitting-diode dental light curing units with distance and irradiation-time. Dent Mater., 2004;20(1):72-9.

Published

2026-05-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DOS SANTOS, Andrely Carolyne Oliveira et al. THE INFLUENCE OF CURING LIGHT TIP DISTANCE ON THE HARDNESS OF RESTORATIONS. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 8, n. 5, p. e13246, 2026. DOI: 10.56238/arev8n5-116. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/13246. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.