TAX CASHBACK AND TAXPAYING CAPACITY IN THE NEW BRAZILIAN VAT: BETWEEN CLASSIC SELECTIVITY AND PERSONALIZED REFUNDS OF THE IBS AND CBS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n4-017Keywords:
Ability to Pay, Indirect Taxes, Cashback, IBS, CBS, Selectivity, Minimum SubsistenceAbstract
This article addresses a question that has accompanied me since my earliest encounters with Brazil’s consumption tax reform: to what extent does the cashback system created by Constitutional Amendment N. 132/2023 and detailed in Complementary Law N. 214/2025 give concrete effect to the principle of ability-to-pay in indirect taxation, beyond serving as a targeted relief mechanism for low-income households? I begin from the view that classical doctrine regarded selectivity and non-cumulativity as central tools for mitigating the regressivity of the ICMS and IPI, alongside the prohibition of confiscatory taxation and the notion of a minimum subsistence level. Drawing on leading scholarship, I examine the normative content of the ability-to-pay principle, its implications for consumption taxation, and its connections with the protection of essential living standards. I then describe the constitutional architecture of the new dual VAT (IBS and CBS) and analyze the provisions of Complementary Law N. 214/2025 governing cashback, focusing on individualized refunds for families registered in the CadÚnico and on differentiated rates by category of goods and services. In my view, the existing cashback model represents an initial step toward personalizing consumption taxes, consistent with doctrinal approaches that recognize differentiated applications of the ability-to-pay principle in indirect taxation. At the same time, I identify room for a more ambitious design – one that could rely on fiscal and administrative databases to calibrate effective tax burdens by income bracket, in a manner analogous to the annual adjustment under the income tax. I conclude that the current cashback regime expresses the ability-to-pay principle in a still modest fashion, yet provides both the normative foundation and the technological infrastructure for a future model of expanded, income-linked refunds aligned with overall consumption patterns, provided that feasibility, privacy, and legal certainty are preserved.
Downloads
References
ÁVILA, Humberto: Teoria dos princípios, São Paulo: Malheiros, 18ª ed., São Paulo: Malheiros, 2018
BALEEIRO, Aliomar: Direito tributário brasileiro. Atualizada por Misabel Abreu Machado Derzi. - 12. ed. - Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2013.
BRASIL. Emenda Constitucional nº 132, de 20 de dezembro de 2023.
BRASIL. Lei Complementar nº 214, de 16 de janeiro de 2025. Dispõe sobre o IBS, a CBS, o Imposto Seletivo e a devolução personalizada de tributos (cashback).
CARRAZA, Roque Antonio: Curso de Direito Constitucional Tributário, 30ª ed., São Paulo: Malheiros, 2015
COSTA, Regina Helena. Princípio da capacidade contributiva. São Paulo: Malheiros, 1993.
DOMINGUES DE OLIVEIRA, José Marcos. Direito tributário: capacidade contributiva, 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 1998
FERRAZ, Roberto Catalano Botelho (coord.) – Princípios e Limites da Tributação - São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2005.
GREGÓRIO, Argos. A capacidade contributiva. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2011.
GRECO, Marco Aurélio. ICMS e IVA: princípios especiais – capacidade contributiva, não-cumulatividade, destino e origem. São Paulo: IOB, 2000.
MARIZ DE OLIVEIRA, Ricardo. “Mínimo existencial, capacidade contributiva, confisco tributário” – texto para o livro “Temas de Direito Tributário nos Tribunais Superiores: STJ e STF, da ABAT. Outubro/2023
ROCHA, Paulo Victor Vieira da. “Substituição tributária e proporcionalidade: entre a capacidade contributiva e praticabilidade”. In: Série Doutrina Tributária, n. 6. São Paulo: IBDT; Quartier Latin, 2001.
SANTI, Eurico Marcos Diniz de,. Nossa reforma tributária: análise da EC 132/23, do PLP 68/2024 (CBS/IBS) e do PLP 108/2024 (Comitê Gestor, contencioso do IBS, ITCMD e ITBI) - São Paulo: Editora Max Limonad, 2024.