ALGORITHMIC GOVERNANCE AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST: ETHICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR DECISION-MAKING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n1-042Keywords:
Governance, Algorithms, Public Ethics, Public Interest, Public Policy, SustainabilityAbstract
Ongoing technological transformations introduce new layers of decision-making power within the State, particularly through data-driven and algorithmic systems. While these tools can enhance analytical capacity and administrative efficiency, they may also reinforce inequalities, embed invisible biases, and weaken public transparency. This article examines algorithmic governance from an ethical-normative perspective grounded in the principle of the public interest. It engages classical moral philosophy, republican traditions, and contemporary debates on democratic governance, integrating them with the notion of “institutional conscience” and with the GIS Cycle (Governance, Innovation, and Sustainability). Methodologically, this is a theoretical-conceptual study based on a narrative review and critical analysis of legal frameworks and international references. The argument advanced is that the legitimacy of algorithm-mediated decisions depends on four concurrent criteria: universalizability, dignity, transparency, and accountability. From these principles, the article proposes guidelines for public policies involving data and artificial intelligence, including auditability, explainability, bias mitigation, protection of vulnerable groups, and reversibility of automated outcomes. It concludes that, in the digital age, the primacy of the public interest requires institutions to cultivate stable ethical self-control mechanisms capable of aligning technological innovation, social justice, and sustainability. More than a technical matter, algorithmic governance emerges as a profoundly moral and democratic challenge.
Downloads
References
ARENDT, H. A condição humana. 10. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2014.
BOVENS, M. Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. European Law Journal, v. 13, n. 4, p. 447-468, 2007.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2018.
CAVALCANTE, A. F. O Demiurgo e a construção do real algorítmico: ética, poder e responsabilidade no Estado digital. Revista Aracê, São José dos Pinhais, v. 7, n. 12, p. 1–28, 2025.
CAVALCANTE, A. F.; LIMA, J. S. Entre o planejamento e a democracia: orçamento, participação popular e o Ciclo GIS. Revista PPC – Políticas Públicas e Cidades, Curitiba, v. xx, n. xx, p. xx–xx, 2025 (no prelo).
CRAWFORD, K. Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Brussels, 2021.
GREEN, B. The smart enough city: putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2022.
HABERMAS, J. Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997.
HOBBES, T. Leviatã. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
JONAS, H. O princípio responsabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio; Loyola, 2006.
KANT, I. Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
KITCHIN, R. The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2017.
MOORE, M. Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
NOBLE, S. U. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press, 2018.
OCDE. OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD, 2019.
O’NEIL, C. Weapons of math destruction. New York: Crown, 2016.
OSBORNE, S. The new public governance? Public Management Review, v. 8, n. 3, p. 377–387, 2006.
PASQUALE, F. The black box society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
PLATÃO. A República. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
RAWLS, J. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.
UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris, 2022.
ZUBOFF, S. The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.
