THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND AUTOMATION ON EFFICIENCY AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n11-238Keywords:
New Technologies, Efficiency and Access to Justice, Automation, Procedural Integrity, Challenges and BenefitsAbstract
The present work aims to carry out an analysis of the incorporation of new technologies in the judicial process from the perspective of increasing efficiency and improving access to justice. In this sense, advances in ICT and Artificial Intelligence, as well as automation systems, are responsible for modifying various aspects of the judicial process, from case management to decision-making, thus generating a large number of useful tools for the process. that influence the rights that must be respected throughout the process, initially, we take into consideration the right to access to justice, the right to literate assistance and the right to an independent and impartial judge. These innovations allow the automation of bureaucratic tasks, significantly reducing the time and resources needed to manage these processes. Furthermore, minimizing human errors and ensuring more accurate and detailed analysis of large volumes of data. Digitization facilitates access to legal services, making justice more accessible, especially for individuals in remote areas or with few resources, however, it is essential that the implementation of these technologies is carried out in an ethical and responsible manner, ensuring the protection of fundamental rights and the integrity of the judicial process. In summary, technology is playing a crucial role in modernizing the judicial system, promoting greater efficiency, accuracy and accessibility to judicial processes, while also addressing significant challenges that need to be included as an enhancement of judicial protection to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential problems.
Downloads
References
BASSOLI, Mateus Felipe de Castro. Tecnologia e eficiência no processo judicial brasileiro. Editora Juspodium, 2017.
BIUK-AGHAI, Robert P., and Alvin W. Yeo, eds. Legal Automation in the Age of AI. Springer, 2021.
CÂMARA, Alexandre Freitas. A informatização do processo judicial. Revista Dialética de Direito Processual 37 (2006): 61-69.
CNJ. Pesquisa uso de inteligência artificial IA no Poder Judiciário 2023 / Conselho Nacional de Justiça; Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento. – Brasília: CNJ, 2024.
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro, and Bryant Garth. Acesso à justiça. Porto Alegre: Fabris, 1988.
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro, et al. Access to Justice and the Welfare State. Walter de Gruyter, 1978.
CASTRO, Daniel. Jurimetria e a Justiça 4.0. São Paulo: Atlas, 2021.
CITRON, Danielle Keats, and Frank A. Pasquale. The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions. Washington Law Review 89.1 (2014): 1-33.
CORRALES, Fernando, et al. Technological Sovereignty: A Law and Economics Analysis. Springer, 2021.
COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. Acesso à justiça e direitos fundamentais: o processo como instrumento de efetivação de direitos. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG 55 (2009): 131-145.
FAN, L. et al. A bibliometric review of Large Language Models research from 2017 to 2023. arXiv:2304.02020 [cs]. 2023.
FERREIRA, Pedro. Os tribunais nas sociedades contemporâneas. O caso português. Porto: Ed. Centro de Estudos Sociais, Centro de Estudos Judiciários e Edições Afrontamento. 1996
FERGUSON, Andrew G. The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York University Press, 2017.
FLORES, Joel Machado. A cibercrime e a criminalidade virtual: O uso da tecnologia da informação na prática de crimes virtuais. Lumen Juris, 2009.
GUINCHARD, Audrey. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Decision-Making: The Wide Open? Springer, 2020.
GRECO, Marco Aurélio. Processo eletrônico e garantias fundamentais. Revista de Processo 36.188 (2011): 209-231.
GOMES, Marcus de Freitas. O uso da inteligência artificial no Poder Judiciário e seus impactos no acesso à justiça. Revista de Direito e Tecnologia 4.1 (2018): 47-70.
KAGERMANN, Henning; WAHLSTER, Wolfgang; HELBIG, Johannes.
Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0. Acatech, 2013.
MAURO, Luciano, et al. Measuring the Justice Gap: People's Legal Needs and State Legal Aid. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.
MATHER, Lynn, et al. A Place to Call Home: Tenant Advocacy and Access to Justice. Federation Press, 2019.
MACHADO, Frederico. Automação judicial e tecnologias digitais: uma análise do processo eletrônico no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual 22.86 (2014): 89-108.
NEGROPONTE, Nicholas. A vida digital. 2.ed. São Paulo: Companhia das letras, 2000
PALMER, Rebecca. Integrating Access to Justice: A Resource for International Development Organizations. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
PNUD. Painel de resultados da pesquisa de IA no Poder Judiciário. Disponível em: https: //paineisanalytics.cnj.jus.br/single/?appid=9e4f18ac-e253-4893-8ca1-b81d8af59ff6&sheet=- b8267e5a-1f1f-41a7-90ff-d7a2f4ed34ea&lang=pt-BR&theme=IA_ PJ&opt=ctxmenu,currsel&select=language,BR. 2022.
RESENDE, Renata Teixeira de and Letícia Macedo Neiva. Acesso à justiça e uso de tecnologias digitais: uma análise de interfaces em tribunais superiores. Cadernos EBAPE. BR 17.2 (2019): 248-264.
RICHMAN, Daniel. Automating the Law: AI and the Challenge of Legal Automation. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa; MARQUES, Maria Manuel Leitão; PEDROSO, João;
SUSSKIND, Richard. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press, 2017.
TAVARES, André Ramos. Constituição em Rede. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Constitucionais. V.50, P. 53-70, 2022.
