INFORMAL WORKERS AND THE USE OF NEW DIGITAL TOOLS: RISK FACTOR OR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROTECTION?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n9-190Keywords:
Informal Work, Digital TechnologiesAbstract
The growing presence of technology in various sectors of the economy has transformed the way work is performed, impacting both formal and informal workers. Informal workers represent a significant portion of the workforce in many countries. Informal workers, often operating in contexts of greater socioeconomic vulnerability, face structural challenges that include financial instability, a lack of labor rights, and limited access to professional training. In this context, technological advancement can act as both a risk factor and a means of psychosocial protection. This study aims to analyze the effects of digital technology on the lives of informal workers through interviews with professionals working in different segments of the informal sector in Brazil. Using a qualitative approach, we seek to understand how technological tools impact objective and subjective aspects of informal work, based on interviews with 22 informal workers. The qualitative analysis of the interviews with informal workers, conducted using the Content Analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), allowed the construction of five emerging thematic categories. (1) technology as a facilitator of work and entrepreneurship; (2) technology as a factor in work overload and intensification; (3) autonomy and professional identity construction; (4) technological precariousness and professionalization challenges; and (5) reconstruction of trajectories through technology. In this sense, it is possible to affirm that technology operates as a field of possibilities and tensions, where informal workers articulate their material conditions with their subjective aspirations. Although marked by precariousness and limitations, these trajectories reveal creative and resilient forms of existence, in which digitally mediated work is not only a source of income, but also a life and future project. By recognizing themselves as producers, entrepreneurs, and communicators, these Participants construct new ways of being in the world, confronting structural inequalities with agency, imagination, and meaning.
Downloads
References
Antunes, R. (2018). O privilégio da servidão: o novo proletariado de serviços na era digital. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Castells, M. (2010). A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Chatterjee , S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis , D. & Galati, A. (2022). Transformação digital usando tecnologia da indústria 4.0 por empresas de alimentos e bebidas no período pós-COVID-19: da perspectiva DCV e IDT, European Journal of Innovation Management,(antecipado)
Camargo, L. F., Melo, R. B. de. & Jacob, I. M. (2024). Neoliberalismo e a uberização do trabalho: desafios para os trabalhadores brasileiros na economia digital. Revista Fim do Mundo, Marília, SP, v. 5, n. 11, p. 212–238, DOI: 10.36311/2675-3871.2024.v5n11.p212-238. Disponível em: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/RFM/article/view/15577. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36311/2675-3871.2024.v5n11.p212-238
Dejours, C. (2007) A loucura do trabalho: estudo de psicopatologia do trabalho. 6. ed. São Paulo: Cortez.
Fleury, S., & Lobato, L. (2011). Trabalho e subjetividade: O contexto da saúde mental. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ.
Foucault, M. (1988). Tecnologias do eu e outros textos. São Paulo: Graal.
Giddens, A. (2002). Modernidade e identidade pessoal. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Goettert, J. D. Arfuch, L. (2010). O espaço biográfico: dilemas da subjetividade contemporânea. GEOgraphia, v. 11, n. 22, p. 157-161, 8 fev. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22409/GEOgraphia2009.v11i22.a13587
Grimshaw, D., F. Cooke, I. G. & Vincent, S. (2002), ‘New Technology and Changing Organisational Forms: Implications for Managerial Control and Skills’, New Technology, Work and Employment 17, 3, 186–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00104
Harteis, Christian. (2018). The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace: An Educational View. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5.
Holtgrewe, U. (2014), ‘New New Technologies: The Future and the Present of Work in Information and Communication Technology’, New Technology, Work and Employment 29, 1, 9–24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12025
IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua – PNAD Contínua. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2025.
Kluge, A., Antoni, C. H. & Ellwart, T. (2020). A digitalização como problema e solução para grandes quantidades de dados no trabalho futuro – desafios para indivíduos, equipes e organizações. Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisation spsychologie A&O , 64 (1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000317
Malodia, S. , Mishra , M. , Fait , M. , Papa , A. & Dezi , L. (2023), “Digitar ou liderar? Projetando a jornada de transformação digital de PMEs entre autoeficácia digital e liderança profissional”,Journal of Business Research, Vol. 157,113547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113547
Pereira, Sandra de Oliveira Gomes; Cabral, José Pedro Cabrera. (2019) Informalidade e crise do emprego no Brasil. Humanidades & Inovação, v. 6, n. 18. Disponível em: https://revista.unitins.br/index.php/humanidadeseinovacao/article/view/1753. Acesso em: 29 nov, 2023.
Santaella, L. (2003). Cultura das mídias: Tecnologia e vida social na era digital. São Paulo: Paulus.
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
Silva, J. & Almeida, M. (2022). Trabalho informal e tecnologia: impactos e desafios. Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Trabalho, v. 3, n. 1, p. 45-67.
Todorov, I (1979) As estruturas narrativas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
Zanelli, J. C. & Kanan, L. A. (2019). Fatores de risco, proteção psicossocial e trabalho: Organizações que emancipam ou que matam. 2ª.ed. Lages: Uniplac, 2019.
