FUNDAMENTAL THEORIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION: A CONCEPTUAL AND EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n9-104Keywords:
Environmental Economic Valuation, Opportunity Cost, Ecosystem Services, Externalities, Total Economic ValueAbstract
This article provides a concise and progressive analysis of the main theories related to Environmental Economic Valuation (EEV). Initially grounded in microeconomic concepts related to welfare, such as Consumer Surplus and Pareto Optimality, the discussions evolve to address the market imperfections that justify intervention in the environmental sphere. Pigou's theory of externalities and the market approach proposed by the Coase Theorem are highlighted. Decision criteria for public policies, such as the Kaldor-Hicks compensation principle, and theoretical refinements, such as Hicksian measures of welfare variation, are examined. The article explores the development of the concept of value, culminating in the framework of Total Economic Value (TEV), which encompasses use, non-use, and option values. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the Opportunity Cost Method (OCM) is dedicated as an essential tool for valuing conservation, situating it in contemporary contexts such as Payments for Environmental Services (PES), environmental accounting (Green GDP), and carbon credit pricing. The text concludes that, despite its methodological and ethical limitations, the theoretical framework of the OCM represents a fundamental resource for internalizing environmental costs and supporting decision-making in favor of sustainable development.
Downloads
References
BARBIER, E. B. The policy challenges for green economy and sustainable economic development. Natural Resources Forum. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01397.x
BATEMAN, I. J. et al. Economic values from ecosystems. In: The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, 2011.
BRITO, T. F.; LIMA, J. E. O Teorema de Coase e a resolução de conflitos pelo uso da água no semiárido. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural. 2019.
BROOKSHIRE, D. S.; RANDALL, A.; STOLL, J. R. Valuing increments and decrements in natural resource service flows. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1240202
CASTRO, J. D. B. Valoração econômica de serviços e danos ambientais. 2006.
COASE, R. H. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_6
COSTANZA, R. et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we need to go? Ecosystem Services. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
LIPSEY, R. G.; LANCASTER, K. The General Theory of Second Best. The Review of Economic Studies. 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296233
MANKIW, N. G. Principles of economics. 10. ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2024.
MARSHALL, A. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co., 1890.
MOTTA, R. S. da. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais. Brasília: MMA/PNUD/IPEA, 1997.
MOTTA, R. S. da. Economia ambiental. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2016.
NICHOLSON, W.; SNYDER, C. Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions. 12. ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2016.
NOGUEIRA, J. M. Valoração econômica do meio ambiente: ciência ou achismo? São Paulo: Annablume, 2007.
PARETO, V. Manuale di economia politica. Milano: Società Editrice Libraria, 1906.
PIGOU, A. C. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan and Co., 1920.
STAVINS, R. N. (ed.). Economics of the Environment. 8. ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019.
STAVINS, R. N. The Social Cost of Carbon: A Key Metric for Climate Policy. Resources Magazine, 2024.
WEISBROD, B. A. Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 78, n. 3, p. 471-477, 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1879478
