TREATMENT OF LONG BONE FRACTURES IN CHILDREN: SURGICAL VERSUS CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n58-007Keywords:
Pediatric Fractures, Long Bone Fractures, Conservative Treatment, Surgical TreatmentAbstract
Introduction: Long bone fractures in children represent a substantial proportion of pediatric trauma and remain a source of therapeutic controversy due to skeletal immaturity, high remodeling potential, and growth plate considerations. Although conservative management has historically been favored, recent advances in surgical techniques and implants have led to increasing operative rates in selected fracture patterns. The relative benefits of surgical versus nonoperative treatment across different anatomical locations and age groups remain incompletely defined.
Objective: To compare surgical and conservative treatment modalities for pediatric long bone fractures with respect to functional outcomes, complication rates, time to union, and need for secondary interventions, and to evaluate variations according to anatomical site, age group, and fracture characteristics.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for comparative studies published within the last five years, with extension to ten years when necessary. Randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies evaluating operative versus nonoperative management of long bone fractures in children and adolescents were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.
Results and Discussion: Twenty comparative studies were included, encompassing fractures of the femur, tibia, humerus, and forearm. Surgical treatment was associated with lower rates of redisplacement and earlier mobilization in selected unstable fracture patterns, particularly femoral and tibial shaft fractures in older children and adolescents. However, long-term functional outcomes were frequently comparable between operative and conservative approaches when acceptable alignment was achieved and maintained. Conservative management remained highly effective in younger children and stable fracture configurations, provided that appropriate casting technique and radiographic follow-up were ensured. Heterogeneity in study design, outcome measures, and fracture classification systems limited direct quantitative synthesis, and most available evidence derived from observational cohorts.
Conclusion: Both surgical and conservative strategies can achieve satisfactory union and functional recovery in pediatric long bone fractures when appropriately selected. Treatment decisions should be individualized according to fracture stability, anatomical location, patient age, remodeling potential, and capacity for follow-up. Further high-quality randomized trials and standardized functional outcome reporting are needed to refine evidence-based treatment algorithms.
Downloads
References
1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2010). The management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures: Clinical practice guideline. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 18(11), 718–720. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201011000-00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201011000-00006
2. Bishop, J. A., et al. (2012). Pediatric tibial shaft fractures: Treatment trends and outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 32(5), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b25e5
3. Canavese, F., et al. (2020). Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus casting for pediatric forearm fractures: Systematic review. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 30(5), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02645-7
4. Cheng, J. C., et al. (1999). A 10-year study of the changes in the pattern and treatment of pediatric fractures. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 19(3), 344–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199905000-00011
5. Duan, L., Canavese, F., & Li, L. (2023). Flexible intramedullary nails or spica casting? A meta-analysis on the treatment of femur fractures in preschool children aged 2-5 years. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 32(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001003
6. Flynn, J. M., Hresko, T., Reynolds, R. A., et al. (2001). Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: A multicenter study. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 21(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200101000-00003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200101000-00003
7. Hedström, E. M., Svensson, O., Bergström, U., & Michno, P. (2010). Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents. Acta Orthopaedica, 81(1), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003628780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003628780
8. Herdea, A., Dragomirescu, M. C., Tiron, M., & Ulici, A. (2025). Forearm fractures treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing: Is casting still necessary? Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 19(4), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251352323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251352323
9. Hosseinzadeh, P., Torres-Izquierdo, B., Tippabhatla, A., et al. (2024). Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adolescents: Results of a prospective multicenter study. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 44(3), e247–e254. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002755
10. Hu, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2025). Global burden of pediatric fracture (1992-2021) and projections of future disease burden trends. BMC Pediatrics, 25, 416. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05767-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05767-6
11. Kiani, S. N., Badrinath, R., Baldwin, K. D., et al. (2024). Not just small adults: Operative versus nonoperative treatment in adolescent tibial shaft fractures. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 44(5), e395–e401. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002610
12. Lähdeoja, T., et al. (2023). Outcomes at a mean of 13 years after proximal humeral fracture during adolescence. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 105(14), 1234–1242. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.22.01234
13. Landin, L. A. (1997). Epidemiology of children's fractures. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 6(2), 79–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01202412-199704000-00002
14. Nejadghaderi, S. A., Mosavi-Jarrahi, A., Amini-Seresht, A., et al. (2024). The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2): Frequency of use and adequacy of reporting in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02217-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02217-2
15. Noe, M. K. C., Link, R. C., Warren, J. R., Goodrich, E., Sinclair, M., & Tougas, C. (2024). Pediatric Type I open both bone forearm fractures: Predicting failure of nonoperative management. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 44(6), e512–e517. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002672
16. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
17. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
18. Qiu, X., Zhu, T., Deng, H., et al. (2024). Multicenter epidemiological analysis of related factors in 10,808 hospitalized children with lower limb and pelvic fractures in China. Scientific Reports, 14, 27860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77970-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77970-x
19. Sanders, J. O., Browne, R. H., Mooney, J. F., et al. (2001). Treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children: A prospective, randomized study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 83(4), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200104000-00003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200109000-00042
20. Sanders, J. S., Ouillette, R. J., Howard, R. A., et al. (2023). Nonoperative versus operative treatment of Type IIA supracondylar humerus fractures: A prospective evaluation of 99 patients. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 43(1), e9–e16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002282
21. Schünemann, H. J., Bousquet, J., Vist, G. E., et al. (2022). GRADE guidance 35: Update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 150, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.015
22. Silva, M., & Cooper, S. D. (1990). The role of remodeling in pediatric fractures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 21(2), 247–259.
23. Sinikumpu, J. J., Lautamo, A., Pokka, T., & Serlo, W. (2013). Complications and radiographic outcome of children’s forearm shaft fractures treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 22(6), 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e32836486b3
24. Worlock, P., & Stower, M. (1986). Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 6(6), 656–660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198611000-00003
25. Zhu, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Open versus closed reduction internal fixation for lateral condyle humeral fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03808-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03808-3
26. Zionts, L. E., et al. (2005). Closed treatment of displaced pediatric forearm fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 87(5), 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.01952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.01952
