PROTOCOLO SIMPLIFICADO PARA IMPLANTOLOGÍA CIGOMÁTICA INTRA O EXTRASINUSAL: NUEVO MÉTODO DE CLASIFICACIÓN

Autores/as

  • Reginaldo Mário Miglioranza Autor/a
  • João Ricardo Almeida Grossi Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n3-169

Palabras clave:

Clasificación ZES (Exteriorización Cigomática Simplificada), ZETA (Cigomático Exteriorizado Totalmente Soportado), ZEPA (Cigomático Exteriorizado Parcialmente Soportado)

Resumen

Branemark desarrolló un protocolo para pacientes edéntulos que no presentaban hueso residual, utilizando hueso del mismo origen embrionario, es decir, el hueso cigomático, en combinación con la colocación de implantes convencionales. Con el tiempo, ha habido un aumento significativo en la demanda de implantes cigomáticos y se ha observado la evolución de la técnica, como la metodología exteriorizada del profesor Reginaldo Miglioranza. En este estudio, se colocaron 279 implantes cigomáticos en 126 pacientes, observándose la relevancia de una técnica ya consolidada (con 25 años) y, con diferencia, la más deseada, proponiendo el autor una nueva clasificación para la instalación de implantes cigomáticos, siguiendo la técnica original exteriorizada de manera simple e intuitiva; el protocolo simplificado para la Implantación Cigomática Exteriorizada (ZES) incluye solo dos posibilidades: ZETA (Cigomático Exteriorizado Totalmente Soportado) y ZEPA (Cigomático Exteriorizado Parcialmente Soportado), sustentados por la pared lateral del seno maxilar.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Migliorança, R., et al. (2006). Sinus exteriorization of the zygoma fixtures: A new surgical protocol. ImplantNews, 3(5), 30–35.

Molinero-Mourelle, P., et al. (2016). Surgical complications in zygomatic implants: A systematic review. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 21(6), e751–e757.

Malo, P., et al. (2015). Extramaxillary surgical technique: Clinical outcome of 352 patients rehabilitated with 747 zygomatic implants with a follow-up between 6 months and 7 years. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 17(Suppl. 1), e153–e162.

Kuabara, M. R., et al. (2010). Rehabilitation with zygomatic implants: A treatment option for the atrophic edentulous maxilla—9-year follow-up. Quintessence International, 41(1), 9–12.

Bothur, S., Jonsson, G., & Sandahl, L. (2003). Modified technique using multiple zygomatic implants in reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla: A technical note. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 18(6), 902–904.

Stella, J. P., & Warner, M. R. (2000). Sinus slot technique for simplification and improved orientation of zygomaticus dental implants: A technical note. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 15(6), 889–893.

Migliorança, R. M., et al. (2011). Restoration of the edentulous maxilla using extrasinus zygomatic implants combined with anterior conventional implants: A retrospective study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 26(3), 665–672.

Chrcanovic, B. R., Albrektsson, T., & Wennerberg, A. (2016). Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: An updated systematic review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 74(10), 1949–1964.

Migliorança, R. M., et al. (2012). Immediate occlusal loading of extrasinus zygomatic implants: A prospective cohort study with a follow-up period of 8 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41(9), 1072–1076.

Migliorança, R. M., et al. (2008). Comparative study on the stress dissipation of zygomatic fixtures installed internal or external to the maxillary sinus: A 3D finite element method analysis. ImplantNews, 6(4), 395–402.

Aparicio, C. (2011). A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patient based on the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): A cross-sectional survey. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 4(3), 269–275.

De Rossi, M., et al. (2014). All-on-four® fixed implant support rehabilitation: A masticatory function study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 16(4), 594–600.

De Rossi, M., et al. (2017). Masticatory muscle activity evaluation by electromyography in subjects with zygomatic implants. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 22(3), e392–e397.

Vrielinck, L., Blok, J., & Politis, C. (2022). Survival of conventional dental implants in the edentulous atrophic maxilla in combination with zygomatic implants: A 20-year retrospective study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8(1), 27.

Barausse, C., et al. (2024). Anatomical measurements of the malar bone for safe zygomatic implant placement: A study on donated bodies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22).

Chrcanovic, B. R., Pedrosa, A. R., & Neto Custodio, A. L. (2013). Zygomatic implants: A critical review of the surgical techniques. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 17(1), 1–9.

Bedrossian, E., et al. (2002). The zygomatic implant: Preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 17(6), 861–865.

de Araujo Nobre, M., Malo, P., & Goncalves, I. (2015). Evaluation of clinical soft tissue parameters for extramaxillary zygomatic implants and conventional implants in all-on-4 hybrid rehabilitations. Implant Dentistry, 24(3), 267–274.

Davo, R., & David, L. (2019). Quad zygoma: Technique and realities. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 31(2), 285–297.

Hansson, S., & Halldin, A. (2012). Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology. Journal of Dental Biomechanics, 3, 1758736012456543.

Zoabi, A., et al. (2022). 3D printing and virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(9).

Aparicio, C., & Antonio, S. (2020). Zygoma anatomy-guided approach “Scarf graft” for prevention of soft tissue dehiscence around zygomatic implants: Technical note. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 35(2), e21–e26.

Grecchi, F., et al. (2017). A new surgical and technical approach in zygomatic implantology. Oral Implantology, 10(2), 197–208.

Bedrossian, E., et al. (2023). Zygoma implant under function: Biomechanical principles clarified. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(1), 15.

Bedrossian, E., & Bedrossian, E. A. (2018). Prevention and the management of complications using the zygoma implant: A review and clinical experiences. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 33(5), e135–e145.

Bedrossian, E., & Bedrossian, E. A. (2019). Systematic treatment planning protocol of the edentulous maxilla for an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 40(1), 20–25.

Cidade, C. P., et al. (2014). Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implant angulations for maxilla. Brazilian Oral Research, 28.

Grossi, J. R. A., et al. (2023). Digital planning and printed guides for zygomatic implants. In F. Andretti (Ed.), Brazilian Digital Dentistry Society Book.

Reychler, H., & Olszewski, R. (2010). Intracerebral penetration of a zygomatic dental implant and consequent therapeutic dilemmas: Case report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 25(2), 416–418.

Van Camp, P., et al. (2018). Intraorbital hemorrhage following a secondary intervention at integrated zygomatic implants: A case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 43, 21–24.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-31

Número

Sección

Artigos

Cómo citar

MIGLIORANZA, Reginaldo Mário; GROSSI, João Ricardo Almeida. PROTOCOLO SIMPLIFICADO PARA IMPLANTOLOGÍA CIGOMÁTICA INTRA O EXTRASINUSAL: NUEVO MÉTODO DE CLASIFICACIÓN. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. e12815, 2026. DOI: 10.56238/arev8n3-169. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/12815. Acesso em: 18 apr. 2026.