HABILIDADES AUDITIVAS EN ESCOLARES Y SU IMPACTO EN EL APRENDIZAJE

Autores/as

  • Sandra Nunes Alves Viacelli Autor/a
  • Liliane Desgualdo Pereira Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n3-052

Palabras clave:

Potenciales Evocados Auditivos, Procesamiento Espacial Visual, Percepción Auditiva, Estimulación Acústica, Rehabilitación

Resumen

Considerando la importancia de evaluar intervenciones auditivas para mejorar el aprendizaje, se objetivó investigar la eficacia de dos procedimientos terapéuticos, el Entrenamiento Auditivo Acústicamente Controlado (TAAC) y el Sistema de Estimulación NeuroAuditiva (SENA), analizados individualmente y en combinación, con el fin de verificar la influencia del orden de aplicación en los efectos de la estimulación. Para ello, se procedió a evaluar a 30 niños de 8 a 11 años, igualmente distribuidos por sexo y edad, mediante audiometría tonal, pruebas conductuales de procesamiento auditivo (escucha dicótica TDD, escucha monótica PSI, resolución temporal GIN y ordenación temporal TPD), potenciales evocados auditivos de corta (FFR) y larga latencia (P300), así como la Evaluación de la Percepción Visual (DTVP-2) y la Escala SAB, antes y después de las intervenciones. De este modo, se observó que, en la intervención aislada, el TAAC resultó eficaz en los procedimientos electrofisiológicos (FFR y P300), en las pruebas conductuales auditivas (PSI y TPD) y en la Escala SAB; mientras que el SENA mostró un efecto positivo en el FFR, en la prueba PSI y en el ítem 4 de la Escala SAB. Las intervenciones combinadas evidenciaron una mayor eficacia, especialmente cuando el TAAC se aplicó antes que el SENA, lo que sugiere que el SENA potencia los efectos del TAAC. Lo que permitió concluir que el uso combinado de ambos protocolos constituye un abordaje prometedor para la rehabilitación auditiva y cognitiva, al promover avances conductuales y neurofisiológicos, y ampliar la comprensión sobre los mecanismos de plasticidad neural y sus implicaciones en el proceso de aprendizaje.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE AUDIOLOGIA. Encontro Internacional de Audiologia, 31., 2016, São Paulo. Recomendações e valores de referência para o protocolo de avaliação do PAC: comportamental e eletrofisiológica. São Paulo: Academia Brasileira de Audiologia, 2016.

AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION. (Central) auditory processing disorders: the role of the audiologist. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005. Disponível em: www.asha.org/policy. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2026.

AVANZI, A. M. F.; CARDOSO, A. C. V. Behavioral tests used to assess central auditory processing in children: an integrative literature review. Revista CEFAC, São Paulo, v. 25, n. 5, e5623, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232555623.

BALEN, S. A.; MOORE, D. R.; SAMESHIMA, K. Pitch and duration pattern sequence tests in 7-to 11-year-old children: results depend on response mode. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Reston, v. 30, n. 1, p. 6-15, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16132.

BELLIS, T. J.; JORGENSEN, L. E. Aging of the auditory system and differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder in older listeners. In: MUSIEK, F. E.; CHERMAK, G. D. (ed.). Handbook of central auditory processing disorder: auditory neuroscience and diagnosis. 2. ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2014. v. 1.

BRITISH SOCIETY OF AUDIOLOGY. Position statement and practice guidance. Bathgate: British Society of Audiology, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Position-Statement-and-Practice-Guidance-APD-2018.pdf. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2026.

BROWN, T. Developmental Test of Visual Perception. 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-Ed, 2002.

CHEN, F. et al. Development and evaluation of a 3-D virtual pronunciation tutor for children with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One, San Francisco, v. 14, n. 1, e0210858, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210858.

CHERMAK, G. D.; BELLIS, T. J.; MUSIEK, F. E. Neurobiology, cognitive science, and intervention. In: CHERMAK, G. D.; MUSIEK, F. E. (ed.). Handbook of central auditory processing disorder: comprehensive intervention. 2. ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2014. p. 3-38.

COLELLA-SANTOS, M. F.; PEREIRA, L. D. Escuta com Dígitos. In: PEREIRA, L. D.; SCHOCHAT, E. (ed.). Processamento Auditivo Central: manual de avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise, 1997. p. 147-150.

DE WIT, E. et al. Same or different: the overlap between children with auditory processing disorders and children with other developmental disorders: a systematic review. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000479.

DOMITZ, D. M.; SCHOW, R. L. A new CAPD battery: multiple auditory processing assessment: factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. American Journal of Audiology, Rockville, v. 9, n. 2, p. 101-111, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2000/012).

GEFFNER, D. Central auditory processing disorders: definition, description, and behaviors. In: GEFFNER, D.; ROSS-SWAIN, D. (ed.). Auditory processing disorders: assessment, management, and treatment. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2019.

JERGER, S.; JERGER, J. Pediatric Speech Intelligibility test: performance-intensity characteristics. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 3, n. 6, p. 325-334, 1982.

JERGER, S.; JERGER, J.; ABRAMS, S. Speech audiometry in the young child. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 4, n. 1, p. 56-66, 1983.

KONSTANTINIDIS, A. An integrative review of the literature on factors influencing student well-being in the learning environment. International Journal of Educational Research Open, [Amsterdam], v. 7, 100384, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100384.

KRAUS, N.; ANDERSON, S.; WHITE-SCHWOCH, T. The frequency-following response: a window into human communication. In: KRAUS, N. et al. (ed.). The Frequency-Following Response: a window into human communication. Cham: Springer, 2017. p. 1-15.

KRAUS, N.; WHITE-SCHWOCH, T. Unraveling the biology of auditory learning: a cognitive–sensorimotor–reward framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, v. 19, n. 11, p. 642-654, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.017.

LAWRENCE, B. J. et al. Auditory and cognitive training for cognition in adults with hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Hearing, London, v. 22, 2331216518792096, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518792096.

LURIA, A. R. Fundamentos de Neuropsicologia. Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos; São Paulo: EDUSP, 1981.

MARTZOG, P.; STOEGER, H.; SUGGATE, S. Relations between preschool children's fine motor skills and general cognitive abilities. Journal of Cognition and Development, Philadelphia, v. 20, n. 4, p. 443-465, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1607862.

MEDEIROS, G. M.; SILVA, D. P. C.; PINHEIRO, M. M. C. Estudo do potencial evocado auditivo P300 antes e após o treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado. Research, Society and Development, Vargem Grande Paulista, v. 9, n. 10, e449108102, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8102.

MIKADZE, Y. V.; ARDILA, A.; AKHUTINA, T. V. AR Luria's approach to neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Oxford, v. 34, n. 6, p. 795-802, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy095.

MUSIEK, F. E. et al. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 26, n. 6, p. 608-618, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000188069.80699.41.

MUSIEK, F. E.; BARAN, J. A.; PINHEIRO, M. L. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology, Basel, v. 29, n. 6, p. 304-313, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099009072861.

MUSIEK, F. E.; SCHOCHAT, E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders. Seminars in Hearing, New York, v. 19, n. 4, p. 357-366, 1998.

NARDEZ, T. M. B. et al. Adolescents' self-perception about auditory behavior: agreement with parents and central auditory processing evaluation. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 1, e38-e45, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718966.

NEIJENHUIS, K. et al. An evidence-based perspective on "misconceptions" regarding pediatric auditory processing disorder. Frontiers in Neurology, Lausanne, v. 10, 287, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00287.

OPOKU-BAAH, C. et al. Visual influences on auditory behavioral, neural, and perceptual processes: a review. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, New York, v. 22, n. 4, p. 365-386, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-021-00789-0.

PEÑA-CASANOVA, J. Functional organization of the brain and psychic activity: a view beyond Luria (with Luria). KnE Life Sciences, Dubai, v. 4, n. 8, p. 711-725, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i8.3329.

PEÑA-CASANOVA, J.; SIGG-ALONSO, J. Functional systems and brain units beyond Luria: anatomical aspects. Lurian Journal, Ekaterinburg, v. 1, n. 1, p. 49-53, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/Lurian.2020.1.1.6.

PIRES, M. M.; SCHOCHAT, E. The effectiveness of an auditory temporal training program in children who present voiceless/voiced-based orthographic errors. PLoS One, San Francisco, v. 14, n. 5, e0216782, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216782.

RAMOS-GALARZA, C. et al. Escala de observação clínica para valorar a terceira unidade funcional da teoria de Luria: EOCL-1. Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurología, Guayaquil, v. 28, n. 2, p. 83-85, 2019.

RIGGINS, T.; SCOTT, L. S. P300 development from infancy to adolescence. Psychophysiology, Malden, v. 57, n. 7, e13346, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13346.

ROSS, B.; TREMBLAY, K. L.; ALAIN, C. Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults. NeuroImage, Orlando, v. 204, 116253, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116253.

SCHOCHAT, E. Avaliação Eletrofisiológica da Audição. In: FERREIRA, L. P.; BEFI-LOPES, D. M.; LIMONGI, S. O. (ed.). Tratado de Fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca, 2004. p. 656-669.

SCHOCHAT, E. et al. Effect of auditory training on the middle latency response in children with (central) auditory processing disorder. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, Ribeirão Preto, v. 43, n. 8, p. 777-785, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2010007500069.

SENA SYSTEM. Sistema de Estimulação Neuroauditiva. Brasil: SENA, c2022. Disponível em: https://www.senasystem.com/. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2025.

SHARMA, M.; CUPPLES, L.; PURDY, S. C. Predictors of reading skills in children with listening concerns. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 40, n. 2, p. 243-252, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000608.

SKOE, E.; KRAUS, N. Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 302-324, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb272.

SOWNDHARARAJAN, K. et al. Application of the P300 event-related potential in the diagnosis of epilepsy disorder: a review. Scientia Pharmaceutica, Basel, v. 86, n. 2, 10, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm86020010.

STROPAHL, M.; BESSER, J.; LAUNER, S. Auditory training supports auditory rehabilitation: a state-of-the-art review. Ear and Hearing, Philadelphia, v. 41, n. 4, p. 697-704, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000806.

SUGAHARA, C. et al. The role of the second brain functional unit II on the memory's process: a neuropsychological Luria's perspective. Research, Society and Development, Vargem Grande Paulista, v. 10, n. 9, e27010917957, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17957.

VELLOZO, F. F. et al. Pediatric test of speech intelligibility with ipsilateral competitive message: narrative review about its applicability. Revista CEFAC, São Paulo, v. 17, n. 5, p. 1604-1609, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620151752315.

VIACELLI, S. N. A. et al. Percepção dos pais sobre os efeitos do treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado em crianças. Distúrbios da Comunicação, São Paulo, v. 30, n. 3, p. 542-550, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2018v30i3p-542-550.

WHITE-SCHWOCH, T. et al. Case studies in neuroscience: subcortical origins of the frequency-following response. Journal of Neurophysiology, Bethesda, v. 122, n. 2, p. 844-848, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00112.2019.

WHITE-SCHWOCH, T.; KRAUS, N. The Janus face of auditory learning: how life in sound shapes everyday communication. In: KRAUS, N. et al. (ed.). The Frequency-Following Response: a window into human communication. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 121-158.

ZILIOTTO, K. N.; GIL, D. Treinamento Auditivo Acusticamente Controlado (TAAC): princípios e prática. São Paulo: BookToy, 2011.

ZILIOTTO, K. N.; KALIL, D. M.; ALMEIDA, C. I. R. PSI em Português. In: PEREIRA, L. D.; SCHOCHAT, E. (ed.). Processamento Auditivo Central: manual de avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise, 1997. p. 113-128.

Publicado

2026-03-12

Número

Sección

Artigos

Cómo citar

VIACELLI, Sandra Nunes Alves; PEREIRA, Liliane Desgualdo. HABILIDADES AUDITIVAS EN ESCOLARES Y SU IMPACTO EN EL APRENDIZAJE. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. e12496, 2026. DOI: 10.56238/arev8n3-052. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/12496. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2026.