FROM STRUGGLE TO ORDER: LAW IN THE THEORIES OF MARX, DURKHEIM, AND WEBER

Authors

  • Ana Paula Fernandes Teixeira Author
  • Mariana Fernandes Teixeira Author
  • Anna Paula Lemos Santos Peres Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n11-129

Keywords:

Legal Sociology, Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Modern Law

Abstract

The sociology of law is one of the essential disciplines in the academic training of a jurist and is important for the study of any legal topic. In this context, this work aims to analyze the classical conceptions of legal sociology, based on the contributions of Karl Marx, Émile Durkheim, and Max Weber, in order to understand the theoretical foundations that structure modern law. Through a theoretical approach, the work shows that, for Marx, in Economic Manuscripts of 1857-1858 and Capital, law constitutes an instrument of the capitalist superstructure, aimed at maintaining class inequalities; for Durkheim, in The Rules of Sociological Method and The Division of Labor in Society, it represents a social fact whose form reflects the type of solidarity prevailing in a given society; and, for Weber, in Economy and Society, law is a rational order of legal domination, linked to bureaucracy and the legitimation of power. Comparative analysis demonstrates that, although they start from distinct epistemological assumptions, the three authors converge on the centrality of law in social organization and the reproduction of power relations, as well as on the perspective of law as an instrument of domination and, potentially, of social transformation, depending on how power is distributed and legitimized in different spheres of modernity. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that the research reinforces the importance of a critical reading of the legal phenomenon, situated within the historical and sociological context of modern social relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARON, Raymond. As etapas do pensamento sociológico. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.

BARBOSA, Maria Lígia; QUINTANEIRO, Tânia. Um Toque Clássico: Marx, Durkheim, Weber. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2017.

BRAGA, Diva; LEMOS, Luciano Braga; LEMOS, Rodrigo Braga; LEMOS, Rafaela Paoliello Sossai. O Direito na perspectiva dos autores da Sociologia

Clássica: Durkheim, Weber e Marx. De Jure - Revista Jurídica do Ministério Público de Minas Gerais. Disponível em: <https://memoriadigital.mpmg.mp.br/wp-content/uploads/tainacan-items/4829/7918/2_Braga-et-al.pdf>. Acesso em: 17 out. 2025.

BOTTOMORE, Tom. Dicionário do pensamento marxista. [Edição digital]. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2013.

DURKHEIM, Émile. As regras do método sociológico. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

DURKHEIM, Émile. Da divisão do trabalho social. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

FREITAS, Amílcar Cardoso Vilaça; COSTA, Elizardo Scarpati. O direito moderno sob a ótica dos clássicos da sociologia: análises e questionamentos, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-49792013000300014>. Acesso em: 17 out. 2025.

MARX, Karl. Manuscritos econômicos de 1857-1858. Esboços da crítica da economia política. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2011.

MARX, Karl. O capital: livro I. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2013.

MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Manifesto do Partido Comunista. São Paulo: Boitempo, 1998.

MASCARO, Alysson Leandro. Filosofia do direito. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.

PACHUKANIS, Evguiéni B. Teoria geral do direito e o marxismo. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2017.

PEREIRA, Francisco. Karl Marx e o direito: elementos para uma crítica marxista do direito. Salvador: Laboratório de estudos e pesquisas marxistas, 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 03 ago. 2016.

QUINTANEIRO, Tânia. Um toque de clássicos: Marx, Durkheim e Weber. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 1999.

WEBER, Max. Economia e sociedade. Brasília: Editora da UnB, 1999.

Published

2025-11-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TEIXEIRA, Ana Paula Fernandes; TEIXEIRA, Mariana Fernandes; PERES, Anna Paula Lemos Santos. FROM STRUGGLE TO ORDER: LAW IN THE THEORIES OF MARX, DURKHEIM, AND WEBER. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 7, n. 11, p. e9926, 2025. DOI: 10.56238/arev7n11-129. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/9926. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.