SELECTIVITY OF THE HERBICIDE DICAMBA (XTENDICAM) APPLIED AT THE TILLERING STAGE OF WHEAT

Authors

  • Sttéfani Vitória Zago Cagnini Author
  • Pedro Valério Dutra de Moraes Author
  • Maira Cristina Schuster Russiano Author
  • Samara Baú Morgan Author
  • Joana Lucia Pagnussat Author
  • Vitor Negri Author
  • Patricia Rossi Author
  • André Bressiani Machado Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n5-083

Keywords:

Tillering, Phytotoxicity, Chemical Management, Weeds

Abstract

The use of hormonal herbicides in wheat requires evaluation regarding selectivity, especially for molecules without registered recommendations for this crop. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different doses of dicamba (Xtendicam) applied at the tillering stage of wheat on phytotoxicity and yield components. The experiment was conducted under field conditions in Verê, Paraná, Brazil, using a randomized complete block design with four replications and five treatments (0; 0.4; 0.6; 0.8; and 1 L ha⁻¹). The evaluated variables included phytotoxicity, plant height, number of tillers, number of grains per spike, thousand-grain weight, dry biomass, and yield. Increasing doses resulted in higher phytotoxicity, reaching 15.5% at 42 days after application at the highest dose, which was considered low and reversible. Reductions were observed in plant height, number of tillers, and number of grains per spike at higher doses. Grain yield was reduced at all doses, with a significant difference at 0.8 L ha⁻¹, showing a reduction of up to 34.9% compared to the control. The number of plants per linear meter, dry biomass, and thousand-grain weight were not affected. The results indicate that, although visual phytotoxicity was low, dicamba negatively affects wheat yield components. The dose of 0.4 L ha⁻¹ showed the lowest impact on the crop and was considered the safest under the evaluated conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVARES, C. A. et al. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Stuttgart, v. 22, n. 6, p. 711–728, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

BHERING, L. L. Rbio: a tool for biometric and statistical analysis using the R platform. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, Viçosa, v. 17, p. 187–190, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332017v17n2s29

BROCHADO, M. et al. Novas perspectivas para utilização do dicamba na agricultura brasileira. Ponta Grossa: Atena, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.16821180215

COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO (CONAB). Análise mensal de trigo. Disponível em: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/analises-do-mercado-agropecuario-e-extrativista/analises-do-mercado/historico-mensal-de-trigo. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2024.

CUNHA, G. R.; CAIERÃO, E. Informações técnicas para trigo e triticale. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2023.

DERSCHEID, L. S. Physiological and morphological responses of barley to 2,4-D. Plant Physiology, Bethesda, v. 27, p. 121–134, 1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.27.1.121

FLECK, N. G.; CANDEMIL, C. R. Avaliação da seletividade de herbicidas utilizados na cultura do trigo (Triticum aestivum L.). Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, Porto Alegre, v. 1, n. 2, p. 217–224, 1995.

GALON, L. et al. Manejo de plantas daninhas em cereais de inverno. Passo Fundo: Embrapa, 2010.

GOMES, F. P. Curso de estatística experimental. 13. ed. Piracicaba: Nobel, 1990.

NUNES, A. L. et al. Tolerância de espécies de inverno a herbicidas residuais. Scientia Agraria, Curitiba, v. 8, n. 4, p. 443–448, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v8i4.9895

OLIVEIRA, K. F.; GREIDANUS, P. Considerações sobre épocas de aplicação de 2,4-D e dicamba em trigo. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE HERBICIDAS E PLANTAS DANINHAS, 18., 1991, Brasília, DF. Resumos. Brasília, DF: SBHED, 1991. p. 90.

PINTHUS, M. J.; NATOWITZ, E. Effects of growth regulators on wheat. [S.l.: s.n.], 1967.

RODRIGUES, O. Efeito da aplicação de herbicida hormonal em diferentes estádios de desenvolvimento de trigo (Triticum aestivum L.). Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, Londrina, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19–29, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v5i1.41

ROMAN, E. S. et al. Como funcionam os herbicidas: da biologia à aplicação. 21. ed. Passo Fundo: Berthier, 2005.

ROMAN, E. S.; VARGAS, L.; RODRIGUES, O. Manejo e controle de plantas daninhas em trigo. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2006.

SEMENTEC AGRONEGÓCIOS. ORS Senna. Disponível em: https://www.sementec.com.br/variedade/ors-senna/. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2024.

SENSIX. Tudo sobre o herbicida dicamba. Disponível em: https://blog.sensix.ag. Acesso em: 1 out. 2023.

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DA CIÊNCIA DAS PLANTAS DANINHAS (SBCPD). Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. Londrina: SBCPD, 1995.

VELLOSO, J. A. R. O.; DAL'PIAZ, R. Controle de azevém (Lolium multiflorum L.) e gorga (Spergula arvensis L.) e seletividade de herbicidas às culturas de trigo, cevada e centeio. Planta Daninha, Passo Fundo, v. 2, p. 8–13, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83581982000200002

Published

2026-05-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CAGNINI, Sttéfani Vitória Zago; DE MORAES, Pedro Valério Dutra; RUSSIANO, Maira Cristina Schuster; MORGAN, Samara Baú; PAGNUSSAT, Joana Lucia; NEGRI, Vitor; ROSSI, Patricia; MACHADO, André Bressiani. SELECTIVITY OF THE HERBICIDE DICAMBA (XTENDICAM) APPLIED AT THE TILLERING STAGE OF WHEAT. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 8, n. 5, p. e13183 , 2026. DOI: 10.56238/arev8n5-083. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/13183. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2026.