INDICATIONS OF UNDERUTILIZATION OF EPINEPHRINE AUTO-INJECTORS IN THE FACE OF THE INCREASING CASES OF PEDIATRIC ANAPHYLAXIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev8n1-127Keywords:
Epinephrine, Anaphylaxis, PediatricsAbstract
Anaphylaxis is an acute, systemic, and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction whose incidence has increased significantly in the pediatric population. Epinephrine is recognized as the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, with the auto-injectable formulation being the safest option for early administration. However, evidence indicates frequent underutilization of this medication, which may compromise clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze, through an integrative literature review, the scientific evidence regarding the indications and underutilization of epinephrine auto-injectors in the management of pediatric anaphylaxis. The methodology consisted of an integrative review guided by the PRISMA 2020 recommendations and structured according to the PICO strategy. Searches were conducted in the PubMed, BVS, and LILACS databases, including original articles published between 2020 and 2025 in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. After applying the eligibility criteria, nine studies were included in the final sample. The findings demonstrated that, despite the well-established efficacy and safety of epinephrine, its use in pediatric patients remains heterogeneous. Factors such as delayed recognition of anaphylaxis, professional uncertainty, limited access to auto-injectors, and inadequate follow-up after hospital discharge contributed to the underutilization of epinephrine. Recent studies also highlighted that emerging technologies, such as intranasal epinephrine, may facilitate timely administration and reduce hesitation in its use. In conclusion, the underutilization of epinephrine auto-injectors in pediatrics is not related to a lack of scientific evidence, but rather to clinical, educational, and structural barriers. Integrated strategies, including continuous professional training, standardized clinical protocols, and expanded access to epinephrine auto-injectors, are essential to improve anaphylaxis management and reduce pediatric morbidity and mortality.
Downloads
References
ANDRADE, Vitória Ellen De Assis Ramos et al. Atendimento à anafilaxia na emergência pediátrica: um resumo de literatura. Revista Multidisciplinar em Saúde, v. 2, n. 2, p. 18-18, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51161/rems/960
AMOAKO, Jeffrey et al. Evaluation of use of epinephrine and time to first dose and outcomes in pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA Network Open, v. 6, n. 3, p. e235187-e235187, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5187
CHA, Lily Myung-Jin et al. The timely administration of epinephrine and related factors in children with anaphylaxis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, v. 11, n. 19, p. 5494, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195494
COHEN, Joanna S. et al. Epinephrine autoinjector prescription filling after pediatric emergency department discharge. In: Allergy and Asthma Proceedings. 2021. p. 142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159060396.61182308
CRESCIOLI, Giada et al. Epinephrine nasal spray for the treatment of anaphylaxis: perspectives in pediatrics. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, v. 25, n. 6, p. 511-517, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000001109
DRIBIN, Timothy E. et al. Timing of repeat epinephrine to inform paediatric anaphylaxis observation periods: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, v. 9, n. 7, p. 484-496, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00139-7
DRIBIN, Timothy E. et al. PEMCRC anaphylaxis study protocol: a multicentre cohort study to derive and validate clinical decision models for the emergency department management of children with anaphylaxis. BMJ open, v. 11, n. 1, p. e037341, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037341
DRIBIN, Timothy E. et al. Trends and variation in pediatric anaphylaxis care from 2016 to 2022. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1184-1189, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.029
EBISAWA, Motohiro et al. Spray nasal de epinefrina melhora os sintomas alérgicos em pacientes que passam por teste de provocação oral alimentar, fase 3. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2025.
FLEISCHER, David M. et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of neffy, Epinephrine Nasal Spray, in Pediatric Allergy Patients. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.019
HERMISDORF, Júlia Aguiar et al. Fatores que influenciam o manejo inadequado da anafilaxia em emergências pediátricas: Revisão integrativa da literatura. Research, Society and Development, v. 13, n. 11, p. e132131147459-e132131147459, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i11.47459
HO, Chia-Hua et al. Physician adherence to anaphylaxis guidelines among different age groups in emergency departments: 20-Year observational study. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, v. 132, n. 4, p. 519-524. e2, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.026
JULIANO, Iraildes Andrade. Acesso Ao Tratamento Da Anafilaxia No Brasil Pela via Judicial No Âmbito Do Sus: O Caso Da Adrenalina (Epinefrina) Autoinjetável. Anais do... Seminário de Iniciação Científica, 2023.
KIENZLE, Martha F. et al. Intervalos de dosagem de epinefrina estão associados a desfechos de parada cardíaca hospitalar pediátrica: um estudo multicêntrico. Medicina de cuidados críticos, v. 52, n. 9, p. 1344-1355, 2024.
MARQUES, Alberto Sampaio; CHERMONT, Aurimery Gomes. Anafilaxia em crianças: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. RECIMA21-Revista Científica Multidisciplinar-ISSN 2675-6218, v. 5, n. 2, p. e524798-e524798, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v5i2.4798
NATARAJ, Rajeshwari et al. Epinephrine vs norepinephrine as the initial vasoactive agent in pediatric septic shock: A feasibility randomized controlled trial for recruitment rates and protocol adherence, the epinephrine vs norepinephrine in pediatric septic shock trial. Indian journal of critical care medicine: peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, v. 29, n. 9, p. 737, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25043
NETO, Herberto J. Chong et al. Diretrizes da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia e Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria para sibilância e asma no pré-escolar. Arq Asma Alerg Imunol, v. 2, n. 2, p. 163-208, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2526-5393.20180020
NUNES, Keniel Heberth Oliveria et al. Anafilaxia: Do Diagnóstico Precoce Ao Manejo Terapêutico. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, v. 10, n. 8, p. 2982-2989, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i8.15179
PISTINER, Michael et al. Factors associated with epinephrine use in the treatment of anaphylaxis in infants and toddlers. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, v. 12, n. 2, p. 364-371. e1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2023.10.049