INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED TEACHING PRACTICES FOR THE TEACHING OF NATURAL SCIENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n12-095Keywords:
Educational Technologies, Science Teaching, Active MethodologiesAbstract
Science education is fundamental for the formation of critical citizens, capable of interpreting the world around them, and schools play a crucial role in building this knowledge. This project seeks to understand the development of competencies and skills in the Natural Sciences curriculum component through Innovative Pedagogical Practices mediated by technologies. The research, which took a qualitative approach and was characterized as a field study, was conducted with 6th-grade elementary school students at a public school in Manaus, Amazonas. Due to the pandemic, the activities were conducted both in person and virtually, divided into three phases: diagnosis, application, and evaluation. In the diagnostic phase, extensive bibliographic research was conducted on science teaching and the main Innovative Pedagogical Practices. After defining the characteristics of the students through a semi-structured questionnaire, the second phase began, in which four lesson plans were developed and applied: Technology-enriched classroom, Flipped classroom, Personalized teaching, and Station rotation. In the final phase, the results were analyzed using Bardin's content analysis methodology, and a final questionnaire was administered to students about the activities carried out. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the project, with all students successfully completing the activities, even without prior familiarity with the methods used, and achieving an average score of 8.5 in the assessments. The methodologies employed made the classes more dynamic and the students more active and collaborative in the construction of knowledge. The use of technologies not only enriched and expanded the possibilities for teaching, but also facilitated the inclusion of students in modern society, where mastery of technologies is essential. In addition, the innovative pedagogical practices adopted provided a more interactive and engaging educational experience, allowing students to develop critical and collaborative skills essential for their future. The study demonstrates that even in challenging contexts such as the pandemic, it is possible to implement effective methodologies that promote meaningful and inclusive learning.
Downloads
References
ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIÊNCIAS. O Ensino de ciências e a educação básica: propostas para superar a crise. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 2008. 56p.
ANDRADE, M. C. F; SOUZA, P. R. Modelos de rotação do ensino híbrido: Estações de trabalho e sala de aula invertida. E-Tech: Tecnologias para Competitividade Industrial, v. 9, n. 1, 2016. p. 3-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18624/e-tech.v9i1.773
BABBIE, E. R. The practice of social research (14ª ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2016.
BACICH, L.; NETO, A. T.; TREVISANI, F.D. Ensino híbrido: personalização e tecnologia na educação. Penso Editora, 2015.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.
BRASIL. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília – DF, 2018. Disponível em: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_sit e.pdf. Acesso em: 30/03/2024.
BURGUESS, R. G. In the field: An introduction to field research. London: Routledge, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203418161
CANNATÁ, V. Ensino Híbrido na Educação Básica: narrativas docentes sobre a abordagem metodológica na perspectiva da personalização do ensino. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação). Universidade Metodista de São Paulo. 153f., 2017a.
CARDOSO, A.P. P.O. Inovar com a investigação-ação: desafios para a formação de professores. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra / Coimbra University Press. 2014. 61.p. CIEB. O Papel das Práticas Pedagógicas Inovadoras Mediadas por Tecnologia. Disponível em: https://cieb.net.br/o-papel-das-praticas-pedagogicas-inovadoras-mediadas-portecnologia/. Acesso em: 05/05/2024.
COSTA, C. S.; MATTOS, F. R. P. Tecnologia na sala de aula em relatos de professores. / Christine Sertã Costa, Francisco Roberto Pinto Mattos. (organizadores). – Curitiba: CRV, 2016. 202p.
DELIZOICOV, D. et al. Ensino de Ciências: Fundamentos e métodos. -3. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
FOFONCA, E.et al. Metodologias pedagógicas inovadoras: contextos da educação básica e da educação superior / Eduardo Fofonca (Coord.); Glaucia da Silva Brito, Marcelo Estevam, Nuria Pons Villardel Camas (Orgs.). Curitiba: Editora IFPR, 2018. 197 p. v. 1.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 40ª ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
SAMPIERI, R. H. Metodologia de pesquisa. – 5. ed. – Dados eletrônicos. – Porto Alegre: Penso, 2013.
LIEBSCHER,P. Quantity with quality? Teaching quantitative and qualitative methods in a LIS Master’s program. Library Trends, v. 46, n. 4, p. 668-680, 1998.
MATTAR, F. N. Pesquisa de marketing: edição compacta. São Paulo: Atlas, 1996.
MORAN, J. M. A educação que desejamos: novos desafios e como chegar lá. 5 ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2015.
MOTA, A. L. O.; PINTO, M. L. Luz, Smartphone, Ação! O uso do aplicativo Estúdio Stop Motion na alfabetização. In: COSTA, C. S.; MATTOS, F. R. P (organizadores). Tecnologia na sala de aula em relatos de professores. – Curitiba: CRV, 2016. 13-30.
PERRENOUD, P. Avaliação: da excelência à regulação das aprendizagens – entre duas lógicas. Trad.Patrícia Chittoni Ramos. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul, 1999. 183 p.
SCHENEIDERS, L. A. O método da sala de aula invertida (flipped classroom) / Luís Antônio Schneiders – Lajeado: Ed. da Univates, 2018.
