Peer Review

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts submitted to Revista Aracê are forwarded for evaluation by two reviewers, who issue opinions regarding the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript for publication. In the event of conflicting reviews, a third reviewer is appointed to conduct a tie-breaking evaluation.

The journal adopts a double-blind peer review system, in which reviewers do not have access to the authors’ identities, and authors are not informed of the reviewers’ identities. This procedure aims to ensure an impartial and unbiased evaluation.

After the reviews are issued, approved manuscripts are returned to the authors so that they may implement the modifications and adjustments suggested or required by the reviewers. The deadline for submitting the revised version is 15 (fifteen) days, and the new file must be submitted through the same platform.

Once the revised version is returned and the changes are approved, the article is placed in the publication queue for one of the journal’s volumes.

All information, data, and scientific concepts presented, as well as the accuracy of bibliographic references, are the sole responsibility of the authors. Revista Aracê assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies or improper use of the information contained in the articles.