IS A DECISION AGAINST LEGEM POSSIBLE?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n11-050Keywords:
Possibility, Against Legem Decisions, AnalysisAbstract
This article aims to answer the question posed by the topic, using as a theoretical framework for research decisions against the law in general. All discussions focus on these decisions based on extreme injustice and founded on injustice. The study of these decisions leads us to the conclusion that they are part of a world of totalitarian regime, in which fair laws are not applied and norms emerge to strengthen the existing regime, considered unjust. The methodology used was analysis, with books as research sources. The analysis leads us to a result that it is necessary to know that it is possible to assess judicial decisions that deviate from the procedure used in the application of the norm, that is, contradict the text of the law, so that justice can be achieved and the law can be applied within the law, based on the idea of a fairer law in any regime.
Downloads
References
ALEXY, Robert. Conceito e validade do direito. 1. Ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2009.
ALEXY, Robert. Teoria da Argumentação Jurídica. 7.Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2023.
BOBBIO, Norberto. O positivo jurídico. 1.Ed. São Paulo: Edipro, 2022.
BUSTAMANTE, Thomas da Rosa de. Argumentação contra legem: a teoria do discurso e a justificação jurídica nos casos mais difíceis. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2005.
FRANÇA, Mhardoqueu G. Lima França. As decisões contrárias às leis na teoria de Robert Alexy. 1. Ed. Belo Horizonte: Dialética, 2020.
SHECAIRA, Fábio P.; STRUCHINER, Noel. Teoria da argumentação jurídica. 1.Ed. Rio de Janeiro: PUC — Rio, 2016.
