IMPACT OF ROBOTIC SURGERY VS. LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON ONCOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Milena Gabriele Coelho Freitas Author
  • Bruna Duarte Monteiro Author
  • Adrielly Lima Sena Author
  • Guilherme Guissone Martins Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n60-043

Keywords:

Robotic Surgery, Laparoscopic Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Abdominal Neoplasms, Pelvic Neoplasms

Abstract

Robotic surgery has emerged as a major innovation in modern surgical oncology, particularly in the minimally invasive treatment of abdominal and pelvic neoplasms. This study conducted a systematic review of the literature, based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with the aim of analyzing the functional, perioperative, and oncological outcomes of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and open techniques. The search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library databases, including studies published between 2021 and 2026. After applying the eligibility criteria, 46 studies were included. The results demonstrated advantages of robotic surgery, such as better three-dimensional visualization, greater anatomical precision, less blood loss, and a reduction in conversions to open surgery. Better urinary and sexual outcomes were also observed, particularly in urological and colorectal surgeries, due to greater neurovascular preservation. Regarding oncological outcomes, the technique demonstrated tumor control and adequate surgical margins, as well as shorter hospital stays and faster recovery. However, limitations persist related to high costs, the need for specialized training, and methodological heterogeneity among the studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALSHOWAIKH, Khadija et al. Surgical and patient outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. Cureus, v. 13, n. 8, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16828

ARGENTA, Peter A. et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 165, n. 2, p. 347-352, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.007

AZADI, Shirin et al. Robotic surgery: the impact of simulation and other innovative platforms on performance and training. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 28, n. 3, p. 490-495, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.001

BERTONI, Maria Vittoria et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative outcomes. Obesity Surgery, v. 31, n. 11, p. 5022-5033, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05668-4

CABRAL, Manuela Guedes et al. Cirurgia robótica: impactos e limitações no tratamento de neoplasias abdominais. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 6, n. 12, p. 752-760, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n12p752-760

CHABOT, Storm; CALLEJA-AGIUS, Jean; HOREMAN, Tim. A comparison of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Techniques Development, v. 13, n. 1, p. 22-57, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/std13010003

CHEN, Zhi-long et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 18, n. 1, p. 167, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01934-6

COSTA, Yanna de Fátima Pereira Borges et al. Dissecção pélvica lateral em câncer retal avançado: revisão sobre técnicas robótica e laparoscópica. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 7, n. 8, p. 924-933, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n8p924-933

CRIPPA, Jacopo et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer provides advantageous outcomes over laparoscopic approach: results from a large retrospective cohort. Annals of Surgery, v. 274, n. 6, p. e1218-e1222, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003805

DA SILVA JUNIOR, Gil Mario Cordeiro et al. Comparação entre cirurgia robótica e laparoscópica para câncer retal: evidências atuais sobre resultados funcionais e oncológicos. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 7, n. 11, p. 2286-2301, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n11p2286-2301

DE AZEVEDO, Emille Eduarda Franco et al. Cirurgia robótica no câncer retal: evidências atuais, resultados funcionais e desfechos oncológicos. Journal of Medical and Biosciences Research, v. 2, n. 5, p. 917-928, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70164/jmbr.v2i5.951

DE FARIA, Ivan Aurélio Fortuna Kalil et al. Efetividade da cirurgia robótica em pacientes com carcinoma colorretal: uma análise comparativa de desfechos pós-operatórios. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, v. 10, n. 8, p. 3632-3640, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i8.15489

DE MELO, Kadyja Ferraz et al. Tratamento cirúrgico do câncer gástrico: evolução das técnicas laparoscópicas. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 6, n. 9, p. 3952-3964, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n9p3952-3964

EMMEN, Anouk MLH et al. Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, n. 4, p. 2659-2672, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09735-4

FARAH, Emile et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, v. 21, n. 1, p. 272, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03138-y

FENG, Qingyang et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, v. 7, n. 11, p. 991-1004, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5

FLYNN, Julie et al. Patient-related functional outcomes after robotic-assisted rectal surgery compared with a laparoscopic approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, v. 65, n. 10, p. 1191-1204, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002535

FU, Hanlin et al. Survival outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 174, p. 55-67, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.026

GAO, Fengwei et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies. International Journal of Surgery, v. 110, n. 2, p. 1126-1138, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000857

GORGEN, Antonio Rebello Horta. Relação entre grau de preservação do feixe neurovascular e desfechos funcional e oncológico trifecta em prostatectomias radicais assistidas por robô. 2021.

GUIMARÃES, Nicolly Thomas et al. Avanços no manejo cirúrgico do câncer gástrico: técnicas minimamente invasivas versus abordagens convencionais. ARACÊ, v. 7, n. 1, p. 2671-2682, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n1-162

HANCOCK, Kevin J. et al. Optimizing outcomes in colorectal surgery: cost and clinical analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches to colon resection. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 16, n. 1, p. 107-112, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01205-8

HORSEY, Michael L. et al. The impact of surgical approach on short-and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 36, n. 2, p. 1269-1277, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08401-5

IACOVAZZO, Carmine et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and metanalysis of intra-and post-operative complications. Journal of Personalized Medicine, v. 13, n. 9, p. 1297, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091297

IELPO, Benedetto et al. Cost-effectiveness of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for different surgical procedures: protocol for a prospective, multicentric study (ROBOCOSTES). Frontiers in Surgery, v. 9, p. 866041, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.866041

JERBAKA, Myriam et al. Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, v. 42, n. 6, p. 1635-1641, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2022.2070732

KAWKA, Michal; FONG, Yuman; GALL, Tamara MH. Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, n. 9, p. 6672-6681, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10275-8

KOWALEWSKI, Karl-Friedrich et al. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 35, n. 1, p. 81-95, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07361-1

LEANDRO, Alan Davyd Almeida; DE SOUSA, Milena Nunes Alves. Avaliação das cirurgias minimamente invasivas e abordagens convencionais no tratamento do câncer colorretal: uma revisão sistemática de eficácia, segurança e desfechos oncológicos. COGNITIONIS Scientific Journal, v. 8, n. 2, p. e703-e703, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38087/2595.8801.703

LEANG, Yit J. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative outcomes. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, v. 20, n. 1, p. 62-71, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.007

LINS, Emillyn Gomes et al. Impacto da cirurgia robótica na prática da cirurgia geral: benefícios, limitações e perspectivas. Revista Foco, v. 18, n. 9, p. e9914-e9914, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54751/revistafoco.v18n9-178

LOF, S. et al. Risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study. British Journal of Surgery, v. 108, n. 1, p. 80-87, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab254

MUADDI, Hala et al. Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews. Annals of Surgery, v. 273, n. 3, p. 467-473, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915

NETO, Barbosa; MACHADO, Cristovão. Análise comparativa de três técnicas de prostatectomia radical: prostatectomia radical retropúbica, prostatectomia radical robô assistida e prostatectomia radical laparoscópica. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo.

OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo José de. Ensaio clínico randomizado comparando a gastrectomia aberta com a gastrectomia robótica para tratamento do câncer gástrico. 2025. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo.

RICCIARDI, Rocco et al. The COMPARE study: comparing perioperative outcomes of oncologic minimally invasive laparoscopic, da Vinci robotic, and open procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Annals of Surgery, v. 281, n. 5, p. 748-763, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006572

ROCHA, Lucas Almeida Silva et al. Abordagens assistidas por robótica na cirurgia de câncer colorretal. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1363-1373, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n2p1363-1373

RODRIGUES, João Gabriel Oliveira et al. Inovações na urologia: como a cirurgia robótica está redefinindo o padrão de tratamento. Journal of Medical and Biosciences Research, v. 2, n. 2, p. 151-173, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70164/jmbr.v2i2.576

SAFIEJKO, Kamil et al. Robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,731 patients. Cancers, v. 14, n. 1, p. 180, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010180

SIJBERDEN, Jasper P. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in various settings: an international multicenter propensity score matched study of 10.075 patients. Annals of Surgery, v. 280, n. 1, p. 108-117, 2024.

SOUZA, Pedro Lucas Borges et al. Comparação de abordagens laparoscópicas na gastrectomia D2: impacto nos resultados oncológicos e funcionais. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1623-1630, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2025v7n1p1623-1630

THRIKANDIYUR, A. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, v. 106, n. 8, p. 658-671, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0038

WEHRLE, Chase J. et al. Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 38, n. 5, p. 2602-2610, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10783-1

WESLEY VOSBURG, R.; HAQUE, Omar; ROTH, Eve. Robotic vs. laparoscopic metabolic and bariatric surgery, outcomes over 5 years in nearly 800,000 patients. Obesity Surgery, v. 32, n. 7, p. 2341-2348, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06082-0

ZAMAN, Shafquat et al. Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical techniques. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, v. 18, n. 8, p. 1342-1355, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae037

ZHANG, Yuqiang et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Surgery, v. 10, p. 1292031, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1292031

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

FREITAS, Milena Gabriele Coelho; MONTEIRO, Bruna Duarte; SENA, Adrielly Lima; MARTINS, Guilherme Guissone. IMPACT OF ROBOTIC SURGERY VS. LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON ONCOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 60, p. e13188 , 2026. DOI: 10.56238/levv17n60-043. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/13188. Acesso em: 23 may. 2026.