HEMODYNAMIC MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTIVE THERAPIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK

Authors

  • Fernando Malachias de Andrade Bergamo Author
  • Sara Felix Ferreira Lopes Author
  • Matheus Barros Atala Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n60-017

Keywords:

Cardiogenic Shock, Hemodynamic Management, Mechanical Circulatory Support, Pulmonary Artery Catheter, Norepinephrine

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from primary heart pump failure, characterized by critical systemic hypoperfusion and associated with an alarming hospital mortality rate, ranging from 30% to 50%. Contemporary management requires a multidisciplinary and stratified approach, guided by the SCAI classification, and based on early hemodynamic stabilization with the judicious use of vasopressors and inotropes, invasive monitoring, and, in refractory cases, temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). This study constituted a narrative literature review to synthesize the most recent evidence on hemodynamic management and supportive therapies in CS. The results highlight that precise hemodynamic monitoring, using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and echocardiography, is essential to guide individualized treatment. Pharmacological support prioritizes norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor, complemented by inotropes such as dobutamine and milrinone. Furthermore, the introduction of tMCS devices (BIA, Impella, VA-ECMO) has revolutionized the management of the most severe stages. It is concluded that the most effective management of cardiac shock combines rapid hemodynamic stabilization with vasopressors, invasive monitoring guided by CAP, and the strategic use of tMCS, always integrated with early revascularization (when applicable), requiring the implementation of clear and gradual protocols to address the patient's prognosis and complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BLOOM, J. E. et al. State of Shock: Contemporary Vasopressor and Inotrope Use in Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of the American Heart Association, v. 12, n. 13, p. e029787, 2023.

GALUSKO, V. et al. Current and novel biomarkers in cardiogenic shock. European Journal of Heart Failure, v. 27, p. 1106-1125, 2025.

GELLER, B. J. et al. Escalating and De-escalating Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2026. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001070.

LÜSEBRINK, E. et al. Cardiogenic shock. The Lancet, v. 404, p. 2006-2020, 2024.

SAMSKY, M. D. et al. Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review. JAMA, v. 326, n. 18, p. 1840-1850, 2021.

VANDYCK, T. J.; PINSKY, M. R. Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock. Current Opinion in Critical Care, v. 27, n. 4, p. 454-459, 2021.

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

BERGAMO, Fernando Malachias de Andrade; LOPES, Sara Felix Ferreira; ATALA, Matheus Barros. HEMODYNAMIC MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTIVE THERAPIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 60, p. e13084, 2026. DOI: 10.56238/levv17n60-017. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/13084. Acesso em: 15 may. 2026.