USE OF POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND (POCUS) IN THE ASSESSMENT OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS: PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n59-044Keywords:
Point-Of-Care Ultrasound, Fluid Responsiveness, Hemodynamic Monitoring, Critical Care, EchocardiographyAbstract
Fluid responsiveness assessment is essential in the management of critically ill patients, as inappropriate fluid administration is associated with adverse outcomes. In this context, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a key tool for hemodynamic monitoring, enabling dynamic bedside evaluation. This study is a structured critical narrative review analyzing 18 studies published between 2015 and 2025, identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Ultrasound-based methods evaluated included left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (LVOT VTI), passive leg raising (PLR), and indices derived from the inferior and superior vena cava. The findings demonstrate the superiority of dynamic over static parameters, with the combination of VTI and PLR representing the most consistent approach. In contrast, vena cava indices show greater variability and context-dependent limitations, while emerging methods such as carotid flow assessment require further validation. In conclusion, no single method is universally applicable, and an integrated, context-based approach is essential, with POCUS playing a central role in clinical decision-making.
Downloads
References
ASOGWA, C. et al. The utility of echocardiography in estimating fluid responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, v. 16, n. 2, p. 85–93, 2024. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr5050
BOU CHEBL, R. et al. Bedside echocardiography and passive leg raise as a measure of volume responsiveness in the emergency department. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, v. 37, n. 1, p. 141–150, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14338
BOU CHEBL, R. et al. Mitral valve velocity time integral and passive leg raise as a measure of volume responsiveness. Critical Ultrasound Journal, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–8, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-018-0097-0
BUBENEK-TURCONI, S. et al. The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index in predicting fluid responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, v. 33, n. 6, p. 1027–1033, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00282-3
DAI, Y. et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients using carotid blood flow. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1–9, 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06234-5
HOTZ, J.; VAN GEMMERN, J.; KRIEGE, M. Are we always right? Evaluation of the performance of passive leg raising in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Medicine, v. 13, n. 4, p. 1–12, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13040987
ISHIZUKA, K.; SU, B. Critical care echocardiography for fluid responsiveness. Texas Heart Institute Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. e217851, 2023. DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7851
MA, X. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of inferior vena cava respiratory variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiology, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–12, 2022a. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01679-5
MA, X. et al. Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiology, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–13, 2022b. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01678-6
MACIULIENE, A. et al. Variability of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral during breathing cycle may predict fluid responsiveness. Medicina, v. 53, n. 4, p. 245–252, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.medici.2017.07.003
MONNET, X.; SHI, R.; TEBOUL, J. L. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: what’s new? Annals of Intensive Care, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1–10, 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01057-5
NOOR, A. et al. Point-of-care ultrasound use in hemodynamic assessment. Biomedicines, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1–15, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010045
PÉREZ-MANJARREZ, A. et al. Usefulness of the velocity-time integral of the left ventricular outflow tract in predicting fluid responsiveness. Echo Research and Practice, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–9, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s44156-023-00045-2
PICCIONI, A. et al. From fluid responsiveness to prognosis: the emerging role of echocardiography in sepsis. Diagnostics, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1–14, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010067
RICE, J. et al. The POCUS consult: how point-of-care ultrasound helps guide clinical decision making. International Journal of General Medicine, v. 14, p. 3171–3182, 2021. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S307151
ROY, C. et al. Left ventricular longitudinal strain variations and fluid responsiveness. PLOS ONE, v. 16, n. 6, p. e0252812, 2021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252812
SURESH, V. et al. Fluid responsiveness to passive leg raising in perioperative patients. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, v. 23, n. 3, p. 299–304, 2020. DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_72_19
ZHANG, Z. et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Annals of Intensive Care, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1–9, 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0527-8
