SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF BLOW-OUT FRACTURES: PROTOCOLS AND RECONSTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES

Authors

  • Raquel Barbosa Pires Author
  • Mayara Caetano Romero Author
  • Vittorio Hugo Oliveira Moscetti Nulli Author
  • Anna Terra Rodrigues de Miranda Resende Author
  • Érika Virgínya Maciel de Oliveira Author
  • Steffanie Vasconcelos de Melo Author
  • Rafael Rudimar Holler Peres Author
  • Paula Aparecida Caetano Tomás Author
  • Raquel Helena Rodrigues Rapozo Author
  • Tereza Regina Péres Vaz Author
  • Rômulo Pimentel Melo Author
  • Gheyza Torres Chaves Author
  • Hellen Kacia Matias Author
  • Andreza Calazans Rodrigues Author
  • Arnaldo Vinícius Barreto de Oliveira Author
  • Gisele Gonçalves Serafim Author
  • Giovanna Camargo Bomfim Author
  • Fernando Bessa Morato Author
  • Marcella Vanine Damas de Araujo Author
  • Vinicius Arruda Vasconcelos Author
  • Rafael Veloso Rebello Author
  • Marília Domingues Alves Author
  • Edith Maria Feitosa El-Deir Author
  • Cleiton Luiz de Almeida Author
  • Luciano Amaral Borges Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n56-027

Keywords:

Orbital Fracture, Surgical Reconstruction, Biocompatible Materials, Three-Dimensional Planning, CAD/CAM

Abstract

The surgical management of blow-out fractures represents a constant challenge in maxillofacial and ophthalmologic surgery due to the anatomical complexity of the orbit and the need for simultaneous restoration of both function and facial aesthetics. This study aimed to review and critically analyze the scientific evidence published between 2015 and 2025 regarding surgical protocols and reconstructive techniques employed in the treatment of these fractures. It is an integrative narrative review of the literature, conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, and ScienceDirect databases, using combined descriptors in Portuguese and English related to “orbital floor fracture,” “blow-out fracture,” “reconstruction,” and “surgical management.” Fourteen articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included, encompassing clinical studies, reviews, and case reports. The results were organized into five thematic axes: surgical indication criteria, reconstructive approaches, materials used, clinical-functional outcomes, and technological innovations. A consensus was observed regarding the surgical indications—enophthalmos greater than 2 mm, persistent diplopia, and muscle entrapment—as well as a tendency toward minimally invasive approaches, particularly the transconjunctival and endoscopic endonasal accesses. Regarding materials, titanium meshes remain the gold standard due to their strength and biocompatibility; however, alternative materials such as porous polyethylene, PMMA, and PEEK have shown favorable results, especially when combined with virtual planning and CAD/CAM technology. It is concluded that the surgical management of blow-out fractures has evolved significantly over the past decade, driven by advances in biomaterials and digital technologies applied to orbital reconstruction. Nevertheless, there is still no consensus on universal protocols, highlighting the need for multicenter studies and systematic reviews to establish clinical guidelines based on robust scientific evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CHEN, W.; LI, X.; HUANG, J. Endoscopic orbital reconstruction: outcomes and comparison with transconjunctival approaches. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, v. 10, n. 5, p. 123–132, 2022. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004203.

FERNANDES, B. R.; MARCHIORI, D.; PEREIRA, L. A. Técnica de uso do corpo adiposo da bochecha para reconstrução orbitária. Archives of Health Investigation, v. 8, n. 10, p. 1–7, 2020. DOI: 10.21270/archi.v8i10.4739.

HELGER, L.; SCHULZ, M.; MÜLLER, D. Advanced technologies in orbital reconstruction surgery. Medicine (MDPI), v. 61, n. 8, p. 1330, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/medicine6101330.

KIM, H. S.; PARK, J. W.; LEE, D. H. Orbital floor fractures: surgical outcomes and timing of repair. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 32, n. 2, p. 534–541, 2021. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007201.

LEE, M. J.; KIM, Y. T.; CHUNG, J. H. CAD/CAM-assisted orbital reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 81, n. 1, p. 45–59, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.09.012.

MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. C. P.; GALVÃO, C. M. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, Florianópolis, v. 18, n. 4, p. 758–764, 2019. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-07072009000400018.

SANTOS, K. V. R.; GONTIJO, G. M.; LEITE, A. Biotecnologia e planejamento digital no manejo de fratura mandibular cominutiva – relato de caso. Revista Fluminense de Odontologia, v. 3, n. 68, 2024. DOI: 10.22409/ijosd.v3i68.60710.

TISSOT, D.; OLIVEIRA, P. H.; SILVA, F. C. Avaliação comparativa dos métodos de fixação óssea em cirurgias craniofaciais: uma revisão sistemática. Psicologia e Saúde em Debate, v. 10, 2024. DOI: 10.22289/2446-922x.v10s1a4.

VIEIRA, J. K. B.; SOUSA, M. N. A.; SOUZA, W. J. Avaliação das complicações cirúrgicas de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de reconstrução de ligamento cruzado anterior. Research, Society and Development, v. 10, n. 4, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14047.

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

PIRES, Raquel Barbosa et al. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF BLOW-OUT FRACTURES: PROTOCOLS AND RECONSTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 56, p. e11754, 2026. DOI: 10.56238/levv17n56-027. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/11754. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2026.