COMBINED PTERYGOID AND ZYGOMATIC IMPLANTS: ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE AND SINUS COMPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Diego César Marques Author
  • Alício Macedo Faria Author
  • Patrícia de Hollanda Cavalcanti Aragão Costa Author
  • Bianca de Cássia Almeida da Rocha Ferreira Author
  • Eduardo Luna Soliz Filho Author
  • Thaís Rime Romagna Ventre Author
  • Leonara de Oliveira Moura Author
  • Julianne de Oliveira Forti Author
  • Gabriel Marchiori Galani Author
  • Waliston Moreira dos Santos Author
  • Cecilia de Oliveira Costa Amorim Author
  • Ivalter José Furbino Ferreira Author
  • Alex Sandro de Oliveira Martins Author
  • Flávio Eduardo Brandão Author
  • Giordanna Bomfim Vitorino Author
  • Lucas Giovanne Carlos Pinheiro Fernandes Author
  • Lilian Figueiredo Martins Author
  • Graziele Rodrigues Author
  • Luiz Felipe Silva Novy Author
  • Rafael Muglia Moscatiello Author
  • Marcelo Vitale Author
  • Thayná Roberta Dias Santos Author
  • José da Silva Júnior Author
  • Itamar Júnio Vilhena Storck Author
  • Fabyana Vasconcelos de Souza Arruda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n55-114

Keywords:

Zygomatic Implants, Pterygoid Implants, Atrophic Maxilla, Oral Rehabilitation, Sinus Complications

Abstract

The rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae remains a relevant clinical challenge in implant dentistry, particularly when bone volume and density are insufficient for conventional implant placement. In this context, zygomatic and pterygoid implants have emerged as biomechanically stable alternatives capable of supporting immediate loading protocols and reducing the need for extensive bone grafting. This integrative review analyzed the scientific evidence published between 2015 and 2025 regarding the isolated or combined use of zygomatic and pterygoid implants in maxillary rehabilitation. A structured search was conducted in PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science using MeSH/DeCS controlled descriptors and Boolean operators. Twenty eligible studies were included after screening. The findings demonstrated high success rates (93–98%), strong primary stability, and clinical feasibility of immediate loading, particularly when both implant types were used synergistically. Reported sinus-related complications were low (3–6%) and predominantly resolved through conservative management. Methodological limitations were identified, including heterogeneity in study design, lack of standardization of clinical criteria, and short follow-up periods. Overall, the combined technique demonstrates high clinical predictability; however, further multicenter prospective trials and long-term investigations are required to establish standardized clinical protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AALAM, A. et al. Three-dimensional navigation-assisted zygomatic and pterygoid implant placement: A digital workflow to minimize surgical risk and improve accuracy. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, v. 67, n. 4, p. 512–520, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.23.042.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 6022:2018 — Informação e documentação: artigo em publicação periódica científica impressa — apresentação. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2018.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 6023:2018 — Informação e documentação: referências — elaboração. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2018.

BAKAY, C. Finite element analysis of stress distribution in zygomatic and pterygoid implant-supported maxillary prostheses. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 40, n. 1, p. 105–115, 2025.

BALAJI, S. M. Zygomatic and pterygoid implants for rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: Clinical outcomes and complications. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 7, n. 1, p. 3–9, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_76_17.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2016.

BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. A.; MACEDO, M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Revista Eletrônica Gestão & Sociedade, Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 11, p. 121–136, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v5i11.1220.

DI COSOLA, M. et al. Complications of zygomatic implant-supported rehabilitation in atrophic maxilla: A retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 32, n. 9, p. 1057–1065, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13779.

GERMANA, G. Combined zygomatic and pterygoid implant protocol for severely atrophic maxillae: 24-month prospective evaluation. Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 32, n. 5, p. 425–434, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13542.

KOGA, D. H.; CURI, M. M. Photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of biomechanical behavior of pterygoid implants in different load directions. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, v. 27, n. 2, p. 155–164, 2025.

KONSTANTINOVIĆ, V. S. et al. Clinical performance and survival of pterygoid implants: A 4-year prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 52, n. 6, p. 688–695, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.11.009.

LAZAROV, A. Zygomatic and pterygoid implants for immediate loading in severely atrophic maxilla: 131 sinus evaluations. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, v. 22, n. 2, p. 267–276, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12906.

LEONCAVALLO, F. Hybrid zygomatic–pterygoid implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: A clinical and biomechanical assessment. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 34, n. 2, p. 245–258, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13975.

MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. C. P.; GALVÃO, C. M. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, Florianópolis, v. 17, n. 4, p. 758–764, 2008.

MIRDAH, A. Evaluation of pterygoid and combined zygomatic-pterygoid implant outcomes in D4 bone: A retrospective clinical study. Journal of Oral Implantology, v. 51, n. 1, p. 21–30, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00015.

MUÑOZ, V. et al. Survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 32, n. 3, p. 507–519, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13679.

TULASNE, J.-F. Implant treatment of the edentulous maxilla: anatomical bases and surgical techniques. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, v. 4, n. 3, p. 25–37, 1992.

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

MARQUES, Diego César et al. COMBINED PTERYGOID AND ZYGOMATIC IMPLANTS: ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE AND SINUS COMPLICATIONS. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 55, p. e11318, 2025. DOI: 10.56238/levv16n55-114. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/11318. Acesso em: 29 dec. 2025.