DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS: CLINICAL AND LABORATORY CRITERIA

Authors

  • Ryan Rafael Barros de Macedo Author
  • Carla Pinheiro Faria Author
  • Julia Angela Felipe Author
  • Maria Cecília Nascimento Santos Author
  • Elizandra Pereira Trindade Author
  • Vivianne Cordeiro França Author
  • Dalila Ribeiro Maia Gomes Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n55-024

Keywords:

Bacterial Vaginosis, Clinical Diagnosis, Amsel Criteria, Nugent Score, Vaginal Dysbiosis, Molecular Methods, Women's Health

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most prevalent cause of vaginal discharge in women of reproductive age, resulting from dysbiosis characterized by the replacement of Lactobacilli by anaerobic bacteria. Given its association with serious adverse outcomes, such as premature birth and increased susceptibility to STIs, accurate diagnosis is essential. This narrative review analyzes current diagnostic methods, contrasting traditional approaches with new technologies. Historically, diagnosis has been based on the Amsel Criteria (clinical) and the Nugent Score (laboratory, considered the gold standard in research). However, limitations such as subjectivity and difficulty in interpreting intermediate flora have driven the development of molecular methods (such as qPCR), which offer high sensitivity and specificity. The study concludes that, despite the accuracy of new technologies, cost and accessibility still maintain classical methods as pillars of practice, requiring an integrated approach to ensure diagnostic accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABOU CHACRA, Linda; FENOLLAR, Florence; DIOP, Khoudia. Bacterial Vaginosis: What Do We Currently Know?. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, v. 11, 672429, jan. 2022.

BRAUNSTEIN, Michal; SELK, Amanda. Bacterial vaginosis. CMAJ, v. 196, n. 21, E728, jun. 2024.

JAYARAM, Pradeep M; MOHAN, Manoj K; KONJE, Justin. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy – a storm in the cup of tea. European Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology And Reproductive Biology, [S.L.], v. 253, p. 220-224, out. 2020. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.009.

KHEDKAR, Rutuja; PAJAI, Sandhya. Bacterial Vaginosis: A Comprehensive Narrative on the Etiology, Clinical Features, and Management Approach. Cureus, v. 14, n. 11, e31314, nov. 2022.

RAVEL, Jacques; MORENO, Inmaculada; SIMÓN, Carlos. Bacterial vaginosis and its association with infertility, endometritis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 251, p. 251-257, mar. 2021.

SUBTIL, Damien; BRABANT, Gilles; TILLOY, Emma; DEVOS, Patrick; CANIS, Frédérique; FRUCHART, Annie; BISSINGER, Marie-Christine; DUGIMONT, Jean-Charles; NOLF, Catherine; HACOT, Christophe. Early clindamycin for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (PREMEVA): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, [S.L.], v. 392, n. 10160, p. 2171-2179, nov. 2018. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31617-9.

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

DE MACEDO, Ryan Rafael Barros; FARIA, Carla Pinheiro; FELIPE, Julia Angela; SANTOS, Maria Cecília Nascimento; TRINDADE, Elizandra Pereira; FRANÇA, Vivianne Cordeiro; GOMES, Dalila Ribeiro Maia. DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS: CLINICAL AND LABORATORY CRITERIA. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 55, p. e10749, 2025. DOI: 10.56238/levv16n55-024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/10749. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2026.