NEUROMARKETING E TEORIA DA PERSPECTIVA: A INFLUÊNCIA DOS VIESES COGNITIVOS NA TOMADA DE DECISÃO

Autores

  • Eduardo Soares Damasco Rodrigues Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n10-196

Palavras-chave:

Neuromarketing, Teoria da Perspectiva, Vieses Cognitivos, Tomada de Decisão, Comportamento do Consumidor

Resumo

Este estudo investiga as conexões entre o neuromarketing e a Teoria da Perspectiva, com foco na forma como vieses cognitivos influenciam a tomada de decisão. A proposta contrasta a visão clássica de um consumidor racional com os achados da economia comportamental e da neurociência do consumo, que evidenciam o papel de processos implícitos na escolha. Busca-se compreender como estímulos de marketing mobilizam mecanismos como a aversão à perda, o ponto de referência e o efeito de enquadramento, analisando também as repercussões éticas envolvidas. A metodologia empregada é uma revisão narrativa da literatura, com ênfase em estudos científicos e obras clássicas que exploram os fundamentos teóricos e empíricos dos dois campos. As evidências indicam que ferramentas como fMRI, EEG, eye-tracking e GSR têm revelado ativações cerebrais específicas, notadamente na amígdala e na ínsula anterior, relacionadas à resposta emocional diante de perdas e enquadramentos de escolha. A discussão propõe uma leitura integrada entre a neurociência e a economia comportamental, ressaltando como a validação neural dos vieses amplia a compreensão do comportamento do consumidor. Conclui-se que essa integração possibilita estratégias de marketing mais eficazes, mas impõe desafios éticos importantes, ao exigir um equilíbrio entre a persuasão legítima e a manipulação cognitiva, com responsabilidade e transparência por parte dos profissionais da área.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Ariely, D., & Berns, G. S. (2010). Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295

Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843

Canessa, N., Crespi, C., Motterlini, M., Baud-Bovy, G., Chierchia, G., Pantaleo, G. & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The functional and structural neural basis of individual differences in loss aversion. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(36), 14307-14317. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013

Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 517-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/503550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/503550

Cuesta, U., Martínez-Martínez, L., & Niñerola, A. (2018). Neuromarketing: Analysis of packaging using GSR, eye-tracking and facial expression. International Conference on Media and Communication Studies.

D’Souza, C., & Taghian, M. (2005). Green advertising effects on consumer behaviour. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 13(3), 193-205. https://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30008786

De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684-687. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128356

Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., & Kenning, P. (2005). Nonlinear responses within the medial prefrontal cortex reveal when specific implicit information influences economic decision making. Journal of Neuroimaging, 15(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00303.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00303.x

Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002

Fisher, C. E., Chin, L., & Klitzman, R. (2010). Defining neuromarketing: Practices and professional challenges. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2010.496623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2010.496623

Gächter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2007). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2963. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597

Gupta, R., Kapoor, A. P., & Verma, H. V. (2025). Neuro-insights: A systematic review of neuromarketing perspectives across consumer buying stages. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1542847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1542847

Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79-109. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708

Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2008). A current overview of consumer neuroscience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4-5), 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.251

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kalaganis, F. P., Georgiadis, K., Oikonomou, V. P., Laskaris, N. A., Nikolopoulos, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. (2021). Unlocking the subconscious consumer bias: A survey on the past, present, and future of hybrid EEG schemes in neuromarketing. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 2, 672982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.672982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.672982

Karmarkar, U. R., & Plassmann, H. (2019). Consumer neuroscience: Past, present, and future. Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 174-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117730598

Khushaba, R. N., Wise, C., Kodagoda, S., Louviere, J., Kahn, B. E., & Townsend, C. (2013). Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3803-3812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095

Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010

Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47(5), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008

Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007

Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804

McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44(2), 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019

Morin, C. (2011). Neuromarketing: The new science of consumer behavior. Society, 48(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9408-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9408-1

Murphy, E. R., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 7(4‐5), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.252

Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234

Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(37), 9984-9988. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007

Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009

Rick, S. (2011). Losses, gains, and brains: The neural correlates of loss aversion. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(6), 1371-1381. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141938

Sanford, A. J. (2002). The textual basis of context effects in sentence processing. In The science of words (pp. 139-158). Routledge.

Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976

Schultz, W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36(2), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00967-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00967-4

Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.383

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Stanton, S. J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Huettel, S. A. (2017). Neuromarketing: Ethical implications of its use and potential misuse. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(4), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0

Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515-518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1685855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956

Ulman, Y. I., Cakar, T., & Yildiz, G. (2015). Ethical issues in neuromarketing: “I consume, therefore I am!”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1273-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9581-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9581-5

Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business School Press.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-10-18

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

RODRIGUES, Eduardo Soares Damasco. NEUROMARKETING E TEORIA DA PERSPECTIVA: A INFLUÊNCIA DOS VIESES COGNITIVOS NA TOMADA DE DECISÃO. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 7, n. 10, p. e9050, 2025. DOI: 10.56238/arev7n10-196. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/9050. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2025.