NEUROMARKETING AND PROSPECT THEORY: THE INFLUENCE OF COGNITIVE BIASES ON DECISION MAKING

Authors

  • Eduardo Soares Damasco Rodrigues Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n10-196

Keywords:

Neuromarketing, Prospect Theory, Cognitive Biases, Decision Making, Consumer Behavior

Abstract

This study investigates the connections between neuromarketing and Prospect Theory, focusing on how cognitive biases influence decision-making. The proposal contrasts the classical view of a rational consumer with findings from behavioral economics and consumer neuroscience, which highlight the role of implicit processes in choice. The aim is to understand how marketing stimuli mobilize mechanisms such as loss aversion, the reference point, and the framing effect, also analyzing the ethical repercussions involved. The methodology employed is a narrative literature review, with an emphasis on scientific studies and classic works that explore the theoretical and empirical foundations of both fields. Evidence indicates that tools such as fMRI, EEG, eye-tracking, and GSR have revealed specific brain activations, notably in the amygdala and anterior insula, related to the emotional response to losses and choice framing. The discussion proposes an integrated reading of neuroscience and behavioral economics, highlighting how the neural validation of biases broadens the understanding of consumer behavior.  It is concluded that this integration enables more effective marketing strategies, but poses significant ethical challenges, requiring a balance between legitimate persuasion and cognitive manipulation, with accountability and transparency on the part of professionals in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariely, D., & Berns, G. S. (2010). Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295

Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843

Canessa, N., Crespi, C., Motterlini, M., Baud-Bovy, G., Chierchia, G., Pantaleo, G. & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The functional and structural neural basis of individual differences in loss aversion. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(36), 14307-14317. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013

Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 517-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/503550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/503550

Cuesta, U., Martínez-Martínez, L., & Niñerola, A. (2018). Neuromarketing: Analysis of packaging using GSR, eye-tracking and facial expression. International Conference on Media and Communication Studies.

D’Souza, C., & Taghian, M. (2005). Green advertising effects on consumer behaviour. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 13(3), 193-205. https://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30008786

De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684-687. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128356

Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., & Kenning, P. (2005). Nonlinear responses within the medial prefrontal cortex reveal when specific implicit information influences economic decision making. Journal of Neuroimaging, 15(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00303.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2005.tb00303.x

Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002

Fisher, C. E., Chin, L., & Klitzman, R. (2010). Defining neuromarketing: Practices and professional challenges. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2010.496623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2010.496623

Gächter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2007). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2963. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597

Gupta, R., Kapoor, A. P., & Verma, H. V. (2025). Neuro-insights: A systematic review of neuromarketing perspectives across consumer buying stages. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1542847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1542847

Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79-109. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0708

Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2008). A current overview of consumer neuroscience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(4-5), 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.251

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kalaganis, F. P., Georgiadis, K., Oikonomou, V. P., Laskaris, N. A., Nikolopoulos, S., & Kompatsiaris, I. (2021). Unlocking the subconscious consumer bias: A survey on the past, present, and future of hybrid EEG schemes in neuromarketing. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 2, 672982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.672982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.672982

Karmarkar, U. R., & Plassmann, H. (2019). Consumer neuroscience: Past, present, and future. Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 174-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117730598

Khushaba, R. N., Wise, C., Kodagoda, S., Louviere, J., Kahn, B. E., & Townsend, C. (2013). Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3803-3812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095

Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010

Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47(5), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008

Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007

Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804

McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44(2), 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.019

Morin, C. (2011). Neuromarketing: The new science of consumer behavior. Society, 48(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9408-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9408-1

Murphy, E. R., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 7(4‐5), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.252

Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234

Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(37), 9984-9988. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007

Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009

Rick, S. (2011). Losses, gains, and brains: The neural correlates of loss aversion. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(6), 1371-1381. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141938

Sanford, A. J. (2002). The textual basis of context effects in sentence processing. In The science of words (pp. 139-158). Routledge.

Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976

Schultz, W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36(2), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00967-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00967-4

Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.383

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Stanton, S. J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Huettel, S. A. (2017). Neuromarketing: Ethical implications of its use and potential misuse. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(4), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3059-0

Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515-518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1685855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956

Ulman, Y. I., Cakar, T., & Yildiz, G. (2015). Ethical issues in neuromarketing: “I consume, therefore I am!”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1273-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9581-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9581-5

Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business School Press.

Published

2025-10-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RODRIGUES, Eduardo Soares Damasco. NEUROMARKETING AND PROSPECT THEORY: THE INFLUENCE OF COGNITIVE BIASES ON DECISION MAKING. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 7, n. 10, p. e9050, 2025. DOI: 10.56238/arev7n10-196. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/9050. Acesso em: 9 feb. 2026.