GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A WAY OF CREATING PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS: AN APPLICATION IN THE FILM MARKET

Authors

  • Jéssica Nunes Leite Author
  • Bruno Saboya de Aragão Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n8-196

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Film Industry, Consumer Behavior, Cinema

Abstract

This article examines how generative artificial intelligence (GAI) adds communicative value to film marketing assets. Using a framework that differentiates functional judgments (clarity, appropriateness, readability) from expressive judgments (originality, aesthetic value) and considers the role of authenticity/authorship in symbolic assets, we compared audience responses to two posters for the same blockbuster: an official (human) poster and an AI-generated alternative poster. Perceptions and intentions were measured on a Likert scale and analyzed with independent-sample t-tests. The results show an advantage for the AI-generated poster in the "plot clarity" dimension and parity in originality, aesthetic value, interest, composition, genre identification, viewing intention, and willingness to pay. At the theoretical threshold, the study advances a contingent interpretation of the effects of GAI on symbolic assets: when the judgment mobilized is predominantly functional, AI tends to equal or surpass human alternatives; When expressive, parity prevails in the absence of a salient authorship label, suggesting that content and stylistic congruence carry more weight than algorithmic origin. Managerially, the findings support pragmatic advances: employing AI as an exploration engine for diagnostic attributes (narrative clarity, informational hierarchy), maintaining human curation of identity traits, and implementing tests—including authorship framing—connected to attention and buzz metrics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bellaiche, L., Shahi, R., Turpin, M. H., Ragnhildstveit, A., Sprockett, S., Barr, N., Christensen, A. P., & Seli, P. (2023). Humans versus AI: Whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8, 42.

Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task-dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 809–825.

Cillo, P., & Rubera, G. (2025). Generative AI in innovation and marketing processes: A roadmap of research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53, 684–701.

Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42.

DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE. [Cartaz]. [S.l.]: Marvel Studios, 2024.

Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. M., & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45.

Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126.

Eliashberg, J., & Shugan, S. M. (1997). Film critics: Influencers or predictors? Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 68–78.

Field, A., Field, Z., & Miles, J. (2012). Discovering statistics using R.

Hong, J.; Curran, N. (2019). Artificial intelligence, artists, and art: attitudes toward artwork produced by humans vs. artificial intelligence. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), v. 15, n. 2s, p. 1-16, 2019.

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172.

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30–41.

Jussupow, E., Benbasat, I., & Heinzl, A. (2020). Why are we averse towards algorithms? A comprehensive literature review on algorithm aversion.

Karniouchina, E. V. (2011). Impact of star and movie buzz on motion picture distribution and box office revenue. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(1), 62–74.

Kim, Y., Kim, H. J., & Park, K. K. C. (2025). From visuals to value: leveraging generative AI to explore the economic implications of movie poster. Journal of Business Research, 198, 115498.

Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.

Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103.

Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P. (2012). Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 558–569.

Puntoni, S., Walker Reczek, R., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 131–151.

Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 97–121.

Writers Guild of America West. (2023). Summary of the 2023 WGA MBA. Disponível em https://www.wga.org/contracts/contracts/mba/summary-of-the-2023-wga-mba. Acesso em 13/08/2025.

Published

2025-08-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LEITE, Jéssica Nunes; DE ARAGÃO, Bruno Saboya. GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A WAY OF CREATING PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS: AN APPLICATION IN THE FILM MARKET. ARACÊ , [S. l.], v. 7, n. 8, p. e7440 , 2025. DOI: 10.56238/arev7n8-196. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/arace/article/view/7440. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.