MANAGEMENT OF ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: TREATMENTS AND PROGNOSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n55-137Keywords:
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Oral Neoplasms, Prognosis, TherapeuticsAbstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) represents the most prevalent malignant neoplasm of the oral cavity, associated with high morbidity, significant functional impact, and high mortality rates. The oncogenesis of OSCC is multifactorial and involves continuous exposure to carcinogenic agents such as tobacco, alcohol, areca nut, and human papillomavirus infection, resulting in genetic and epigenetic alterations that activate oncogenic pathways such as EGFR, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, JAK/STAT, and Wnt/β-catenin. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment plays a determining role in disease progression, since tumor-associated macrophages, fibroblasts, myeloid suppressor cells, and T lymphocytes modulate proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and immune evasion through cytokines, chemokines, and bioactive metabolites. Clinical management remains based on a multimodal approach, involving surgery, radiotherapy, and cisplatin-based chemotherapy, complemented by targeted therapies and immunotherapy in advanced or recurrent cases. However, tumor heterogeneity limits the effectiveness of these strategies, reinforcing the need for precise biomarkers, such as EGFR, APOBEC3A, and RRAS, for better patient stratification and therapeutic guidance. Additionally, patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have an increased risk of developing secondary primary tumors due to the phenomenon of field cancerization, which negatively impacts prognosis and demands continuous surveillance. Therefore, understanding the molecular pathways involved in tumorigenesis, the cellular interactions of the tumor microenvironment, and the associated prognostic factors is fundamental to improving early diagnosis, guiding individualized therapeutic approaches, and improving patient survival. Recent advances in immunotherapy, proteogenomics, and understanding of tumor microenvironment (TME) offer new perspectives for the development of more effective and personalized therapeutic strategies in the treatment of SCC.
Downloads
References
BADWELAN, Mohammed; MUADDI, Hasan; AHMED, Abeer; LEE, Kyungjun T.; TRAN, Simon D. Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Concomitant Primary Tumors, What Do We Know? A Review of the Literature. Current Oncology, v. 30, n. 4, p. 3721-3734, 2023.
LI, Chenxi; DONG, Xiaodan; LI, Bo. Tumor microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Frontiers in Immunology, v. 15, 1485174, 2024.
Muzaffar, Jamel; Bari, Shahla; Kirtane, Kedar; Chung, Christine H. Recent Advances and Future Directions in Clinical Management of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;13(2):338. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020338. PMID: 33477635; PMCID: PMC7831487.
Norberg, Scott M; Hinrichs, Christian S. Advances in Adoptive Cell Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2021 Aug;54(4):761-768. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 Jun 9. PMID: 34116844.
TAN, Yunhan; WANG, Zhihan; XU, Mengtong; LI, Bowen; HUANG, Zhao; QIN, Siyuan; NICE, Edouard C.; TANG, Jing; HUANG, Canhua. Oral squamous cell carcinomas: state of the field and emerging directions. International Journal of Oral Science, v. 15, n. 44, 2023.
WU, Chi-Sheng et al. Integrated multi-omics analyses of oral squamous cell carcinoma reveal precision patient stratification and personalized treatment strategies. Cancer Letters, v. 614, 217482, 2025.
ZHOU, Jiaying et al. Tumor-colonized Streptococcus mutans metabolically reprograms tumor microenvironment and promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma. Microbiome, v. 12, n. 193, 2024.
Burtness, B., et al. (2019). Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet, 394(10212), 1915-1928.
Bonner, J. A., et al. (2006). Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. New England Journal of Medicine, 354(6), 567-578. (Atualização em 2010: Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(18), 2906-2914).
Bernier, J., et al. (2004). Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(19), 1945-1952.
Cooper, J. S., et al. (2004). Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/Intergroup 0115 trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 60(2), 357-363.
Gillison, M. L., et al. (2019). Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 20(11), 1563-1575.
Richardson, M. A., et al. (1994). Second primary tumors in head and neck cancer: the impact of site and pre-treatment characteristics. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 30(3), 561-569.
Khuri, F. R., et al. (2006). A randomized phase III trial of low-dose isotretinoin for prevention of second primary tumors in stage I and II head and neck cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98(7), 441-450.
Haigentz, M., et al. (2016). PET/CT versus conventional imaging for detection of distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer, 122(10), 1545-1552.