ESTRATÉGIAS DE RECONSTRUÇÃO NASAL APÓS EXCISÃO DE TUMORES CUTÂNEOS MALIGNOS: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/levv17n61-034Palavras-chave:
Neoplasias Nasais, Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Reconstrutivos, Cirurgia de Mohs, Neoplasias CutâneasResumo
Introdução: A reconstrução nasal após a excisão de tumores cutâneos malignos é cirurgicamente exigente, pois a margem oncológica deve ser integrada à restauração do contorno nasal, função das vias aéreas, subunidades estéticas e aparência centrada no paciente. Objetivo: O objetivo principal desta revisão sistemática foi avaliar as estratégias reconstrutivas contemporâneas após a excisão de tumores cutâneos nasais malignos. Os objetivos secundários foram comparar técnicas reconstrutivas, avaliar a tomada de decisão anatômica, sintetizar complicações, avaliar resultados estéticos e funcionais e determinar a certeza da evidência que apoia a prática atual. Métodos: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov e ICTRP foram pesquisados em busca de estudos que avaliassem a reconstrução nasal após excisão ou cirurgia micrográfica de Mohs para tumores cutâneos malignos. Estudos em humanos publicados nos últimos cinco anos foram priorizados, com extensão a dez anos permitida se menos de dez estudos elegíveis fossem identificados. A seleção de estudos e a extração de dados foram realizadas de forma independente, o risco de viés foi avaliado usando RoB 2, ROBINS-I ou QUADAS-2 quando aplicável, e a certeza da evidência foi avaliada usando GRADE. Uma síntese narrativa foi realizada devido à heterogeneidade metodológica e clínica. Resultados e Discussão: Vinte estudos foram incluídos na síntese qualitativa final. A evidência mostrou que os retalhos locais são altamente versáteis para defeitos nasais pequenos a moderados, os enxertos de pele de espessura total permanecem úteis para defeitos superficiais selecionados, a cicatrização por segunda intenção pode proporcionar resultados satisfatórios em feridas cuidadosamente selecionadas, e os retalhos frontais paramedianos permanecem essenciais para defeitos grandes, profundos, de múltiplas subunidades ou estruturalmente complexos. Os resultados funcionais, particularmente a obstrução nasal e o suporte alar, foram relatados de forma menos consistente do que os resultados estéticos. A certeza da evidência foi baixa a muito baixa devido a desenhos retrospectivos, amostras pequenas, populações heterogêneas e medidas de resultado inconsistentes. Conclusão: A reconstrução nasal contemporânea após excisão de tumor cutâneo maligno deve ser guiada pela segurança oncológica, anatomia do defeito, envolvimento das subunidades nasais, suporte estrutural, preservação das vias aéreas, comorbidade do paciente e preferência do paciente. A evidência apoia a tomada de decisão individualizada estruturada em vez de uma hierarquia reconstrutiva universal.
Downloads
Referências
Alexander NA, Longino ES, Sharma RK, Desisto NG, Yang SF, Stephan SJ, et al. Functional and aesthetic outcomes of post-Mohs nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025;27(4):337-345.
Apaydın F, Karakaya E, Tatar B, Ozer S, Acar A. Paramedian forehead flap in large nasal skin defects. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;60(3):156-162.
Baltrušaitytė K, Vaitkus S, Vaitkuvienė A, Šiupšinskienė N. Assessment of standard surgical excision efficacy and analysis of recurrence-associated factors in 343 cases of nasal basal cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(5):513.
Brambullo T, Franchi A, Masciopinto F, De Lazzari G, Pavanello M. A new variant of the forehead flap for subtotal nose reconstruction after skin cancer resection. Front Surg. 2024;11:1408781.
Breneman A, Trager MH, Bowling A, Gordon ER, Pollack K, Samie FH. Simplifying nasal reconstruction after Mohs surgery: an algorithm based on review of over 400 cases. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025;50(7):1395-1398.
Caretto AA, Dall’Oglio F, La Greca G, Giuffrida R, Bianchi L, Lacarrubba F. Photogrammetry is a useful tool to assess the aesthetic outcome after excision and reconstruction of the nose skin tumors. Asian J Surg. 2024;47(12):5804-5805.
Chia J, Ooi ASH, Lim TC. The tree flap: a novel modification of the hatchet flap for nasal reconstruction after skin cancer excision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(4):e5738.
D’Antonio S, Verolino P, Della Corte M, Ponticorvo S, Mazzola RF, Schonauer F. Nasal reconstruction with forehead flap: our 12 years’ experience. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025;13(2):e6574.
Desisto NG, Longino ES, Yang SF, Patel PN, Stephan SJ. State of the evidence for facial skin cancer reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023;31(4):595-604.
Dhaha M, Ben Abdeljelil N, Bouaouina N, Khemakhem K, Hamdi H, Charfi S, et al. Forehead flap reconstruction of oncologic nasal defects: aesthetic and functional outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(8):e715-e720.
Dogan S, Zeynep A, Gökhan O, Cengiz A. A comparison of treatment with skin graft or secondary healing for small nasal wound defects after tumor excision. Dermatol Surg. 2025;51(5):515-522.
Drake VE, Yang SF, Patel PN, Stephan SJ. Decision making in nasal reconstruction: when to use the bilobed flap, forehead flap, skin graft, and other options. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2024;32(2):211-219.
Faenza M, Molle M, Mazzarella V, Antonetti AM, Filosa FG, Pelella T, et al. Functional and aesthetic comparison between grafts and local flaps in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery of the face: a cohort study. JPRAS Open. 2024;42:97-112.
Halani SH, Ma C, Pierce M, Truong T, Yoo DB. Nasal reconstruction after Mohs cancer resection. Semin Plast Surg. 2021;35(3):201-209.
Hifny MA, Moustafa MF, Lashin AM, Abouelnasr MK. The versatility of keystone flaps for skin cancer reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(2):515-518.
Hollier LH Jr, Hollier PC, Stal S. Reconstruction of small nasal defects. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2024;32(2):199-210.
Jeong D, Kim JH, Lee S, Park JY. Chondrocutaneous composite grafts are a viable option for reconstruction of nasal ala defects greater than 1.5 cm. Dermatol Surg. 2026;52(1):55-61.
Li H, Wang Y, Zhang X, Chen H, Liu Y. Application of different repair methods for defects after Mohs surgical excision of malignant nasal tumors. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025;39(9):830-835.
Longino ES, Sharma RK, Desisto NG, Adegboye F, Stephan SJ, Yang SF, et al. Reconstruction after nasal skin cancer resection: nasal obstruction and associated factors. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025;27(6):523-530.
Ma C, Truong T, Pierce M, Yoo DB. Early division of the paramedian forehead flap in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025;27(3):248-254.
Núñez-Castañeda JM, González-Cardero E, Hernández-García E, Infante-Cossío P. Surgical treatment and reconstruction of nasal defects after excision of nasal skin tumors. J Clin Med. 2022;11(19):5615.
Pak KY, Nunez A, Rosenthal A, Conde G, Gharavi NM, Lee MK. Evaluating severity and trends of nasal obstruction following Mohs reconstruction of nasal subunits. J Craniofac Surg. 2026;37(5):e401-e404.
Pedersen SJV, Sander IM, Jemec GBE, Ibler KS. Repair of defects of the nasal tip after Mohs surgery. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:3445-3452.
Rashnoo F, Rezaei M, Hedayatyanfard K, Mahmoudi H. The comparison competence nasolabial and forehead flap in nasal soft tissue defect repair caused by basal cell carcinoma. World J Plast Surg. 2024;13(3):43-49.
Ribeiro RDA, Reis GMD, Saito FL, Ferreira MC, Gemperli R. Paramedian forehead flap in the treatment of nasal, non-melanoma skin cancer: a cross-sectional study. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022;49:e20223034.
Rickstrew J, Rieder EA, Yoo S, Lee EH. Nasal tip rotation flap for reconstruction of surgical defects of the distal nose after Mohs micrographic surgery. Int J Dermatol. 2024;63(9):1247-1253.
Salzano G, O’Connor C, D’Souza J, Culié D, Lisan Q, Bozec A, et al. Surgical outcomes and complications of distal nasal reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025;98:233-245.
Sheehan E, Workman L, Qadir D, Simman R. Nasolabial flap for nasal reconstruction and beyond. Eplasty. 2024;24:QA2.
Shoushtari ST, Patel PN, Yang SF, Stephan SJ. Non-surgical rhinoplasty after nasal skin cancer resection: esthetic benefits and subjective patient outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025;27(5):471-477.
Song JS, Stephan SJ. Implications of malignancy, radiation, and timing of major nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2024;32(2):189-198.
Theelen FFM, Veldhuizen IJ, Zhou C, Lee EH, van Hensbergen LJ, Broekhuysen CL, et al. Patient satisfaction following primary closure or second intention healing after conventional nasal skin cancer excision: a cross-sectional cohort study. Dermatol Surg. 2024;50(3):247-255.
Van Nguyen L, Tran VQ, Nguyen TH, Nguyen MD. Basal cell carcinoma of the nose tip: a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025;126:110657.
Veija T, Veldhuizen IJ, Theelen FFM, Broekhuysen CL, van der Hulst RRWJ, Hoogbergen MM. Immediate local flap versus skin graft reconstruction after standard excision of basal cell carcinoma of the nose. JPRAS Open. 2025;44:182-190.
Veldhuizen IJ, Theelen FFM, Zhou C, van Hensbergen LJ, Broekhuysen CL, van der Hulst RRWJ, et al. A systematic review and overview of flap reconstructive techniques for nasal skin defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(3):1008-1020.
Villegas-Alzate FJ, Jimenez-Torres M, Rodriguez-Morales P, Cano-Gutierrez CA. Descending the reconstruction ladder: single-stage full-thickness skin grafting for wide nasal defects after cancer resection. Cureus. 2025;17(8):e87926.
Visconti MJ, Archibald LK, Shahwan KT, Kimyon RS, Bakker C, Mattox AR, et al. Nasal reconstructive techniques following Mohs surgery or excisions: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023;315(3):391-402.
Wan R, Yoo DB, Hwang CJ, Lee LN. Nasal alar and tip reconstruction following Mohs surgery using reconstructive rhinoplasty principles. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025;27(5):445-452.
Wang MR, Chen SX, Patel V, Maher IA, Alam M. Aesthetic outcomes of nasal reconstruction following Mohs micrographic surgery: a systematic review. Dermatol Surg. 2025;51(6):604-612.
Wen G, Wang CY, Chai WM, Liu F, Ma Q. Secondary intention healing of nasal ala and tip defects. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:2287-2294.
Wu Y, Zhang L, Chen X, Liu J, Wang H. Defect-size-dependent strategy for nasal tip cutaneous wound reconstruction after tumor resection. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36(4):1089-1094.