SUS REFORMS AND COUNTER-REFORMS: PERSPECTIVES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n10-190Keywords:
Health Counter-Reforms, Health Reforms, Unified Health SystemAbstract
The analysis of the reforms and counter-reforms of the Unified Health System (SUS) highlights that public health policy in Brazil is developing in a context marked by institutional advances and setbacks imposed by fiscal and administrative constraints. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using databases such as the Scientific Electronic Library Online, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, PubMed, the Virtual Health Library, the Journal Portal of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, the Institute of Applied Economic Research, the National Council of Health Secretaries, the National Council of Municipal Health Secretariats, and documents from the Ministry of Health, covering publications between 2023 and 2025. Descriptors such as "Unified Health System," "health financing," "fiscal framework," "primary health care," and "health regionalization" were used, intersected with Boolean operators AND and OR. The results demonstrate that recent initiatives, such as the introduction of the Primary Care Equity and Scaling Index and the incorporation of digital health, represent reform efforts that can strengthen the system, but still face obstacles related to insufficient resources and fragmented governance. The conclusion is that the future of the SUS will depend on its ability to consolidate reforms that ensure stable funding, inclusive technological innovation, and effective interfederative coordination, while resisting fiscal counter-reforms and policies that compromise universal and comprehensive health care as a constitutional right.
Downloads
References
BENEVIDES, Rodrigo P. S. Desafios para melhorar a qualidade dos gastos do SUS. Brasília: Ipea, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29327/5198640.1-8
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 1988.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Plano Nacional de Saúde 2024–2027. Brasília: MS, 2024.
CHIORO, Arthur; COSTA, Ana Maria. A reconstrução do SUS e a luta por direitos e democracia. Saúde em Debate, v. 47, n. 136, p. 5-10, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202313600
CONASEMS. Financiamento da saúde no Brasil: perspectivas dos estados e municípios. Brasília, 2025.
CONASS. Conass Informa n. 60/2024: Publicada a Portaria GM/MS nº 3.493 – nova metodologia de cofinanciamento da APS. Brasília, 2024.
COSTA, Nilson do Rosário et al. Austeridade fiscal, COVID-19 e resiliência do financiamento municipal em saúde. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 30, n. 6, p. 1597-1608, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025306.21872024
CUNHA, João R. A. Quais as consequências do novo arcabouço fiscal para o SUS? Cadernos do CIADS/Fiocruz, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17566/pa4tx545
FERREIRA, Victor A. N. Efeitos do teto de gastos e do novo arcabouço sobre o investimento público e a saúde. Nova Economia, v. 34, n. 1, p. 45-68, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/8309
HADDAD, Ana Estela; LIMA, Nísia Trindade. Saúde digital no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Interface – Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, v. 28, p. 1-15, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/interface.230597
ROTHER, Edna Terezinha. Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo, v. 20, n. 2, p. v–vi, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001
SALVADOR, Evilasio da Silva. O arcabouço fiscal e as implicações no financiamento das políticas sociais. Serviço Social & Sociedade, n. 146, p. 45-64, 2024.
VIEIRA, Fabiola Sulpino. Financiamento federal de ações e serviços públicos de saúde por emendas parlamentares e suas implicações para a regionalização da saúde. Brasília: Ipea, 2024.