COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND ADVANCED OROFACIAL FILLING TECHNIQUES IN THE DENTAL CONTEXT

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of conventional and advanced orofacial filling techniques in the dental context. Conventional methods, including amalgam and incremental composite resins, have historically demonstrated predictable performance and durability, particularly in posterior teeth. However, advances in adhesive systems, bulk-fill composites, nanotechnology, bioactive restorative materials, and CAD/CAM workflows have significantly transformed restorative practice. These innovations promote minimally invasive dentistry, enhanced esthetics, and potential biological benefits, although challenges remain concerning long-term survival, operator sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness. Patient-centered decision-making and environmental considerations, such as the phase-down of amalgam, further influence clinical choices. The findings highlight that restorative strategies should integrate the best available evidence with patient needs and case-specific demands, ensuring both durability and satisfaction in modern dental practice.