THE AUDIT OPINION AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR REDUCING THE RISK OF FRAUD IN ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS

Authors

  • Herval da Silva Moura Author
  • Juliano Almeida de Faria Author
  • Carlos Alberto Oliveira Brito Author
  • Luiz Ivan dos Santos Silva Author
  • Célia Oliveira de Jesus Sacramento Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n52-082

Keywords:

Audit, Opinion, Fraud Risk

Abstract

In recent years, cases of fraud in the financial statements of large companies with shares traded on the national and international financial markets have been reported in Brazil. What these cases have in common is that all the companies involved have been independently audited over the last few years and had their audit opinions published along with the fraudulent financial statements. The general aim of this article  is to reflect on the role of the audit opinion in published financial statements . The work was carried out by means of a qualitative-quantitative analysis, using Nvivo® software, based on the audit opinions of the fraudulent financial statements of listed companies with shares traded on the Brazilian stock market over the last 13 years. The data collected shows that auditors are more responsible for detecting fraud in the reports studied. It can be seen that the auditors have given relevance in this context through which it can be conveyed to the users of the information that the results present in the financial statements analyzed have been carefully analyzed from the perspective of fraud detection, given that the auditors assume responsibility in the meantime. The conclusion was that audit opinions should not be taken as instruments to guarantee the prevention and detection of fraud in financial statements released to the financial market, but only as another instrument to reduce the risks of accounting fraud in these statements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albrecht, S., & Zimbelman, M. (2016). Fraud examination (4th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2005). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit (Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99). New York, NY: AICPA.

Annual Fraud Indicator. (2016). Experian, PKF Littlejohn, & Centre for Counter Fraud Studies, University of Portsmouth.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse: Global fraud study. Retrieved from http://acfe.com/

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2022). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse: Global fraud study. Retrieved from http://acfe.com/

Boynton, W., Johnson, R., & Kell, W. (2005). Assurance and the integrity of financial reporting (8th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Davia, H. R., Coggins, P. C., & Wideman, J. C. (1992). Management accountant's guide to fraud discovery and control. New York, NY: Wiley.

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). (2011). Protection of the European Union's financial interests—Fight against fraud: Annual report 2010. Brussels, Belgium: Author.

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). (2019). 30th annual report on the protection of the European Union's financial interests—Fight against fraud 2018. Brussels, Belgium: Author.

Federal Accounting Council (CFC). (2016a). Brazilian Accounting Standards—NBC TA 200 (R1): General objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of the audit in compliance with auditing standards. Brasília, Brazil: Author. Retrieved from https://www2.cfc.org.br/sisweb/sre/detalhes_sre.aspx?Codigo=2016/NBCTA200(R1)

Federal Accounting Council (CFC). (2016b). Brazilian Accounting Standards—NBC TA 240 (R1): Auditor's responsibility for fraud in the context of the audit of financial statements. Brasília, Brazil: Author. Retrieved from https://www2.cfc.org.br/sisweb/sre/detalhes_sre.aspx?Codigo=2016/NBCTA240(R1)

Federal Accounting Council (CFC). (2016c). Brazilian Accounting Standards—NBC TA 700: Forming an opinion and issuing an independent auditor's report on financial statements. Brasília, Brazil: Author. Retrieved from https://www2.cfc.org.br/sisweb/sre/detalhes_sre.aspx?codigo=2016/NBCTA700

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.

Flesher, D. L., Previts, G. J., & Samson, W. D. (2005). Auditing in the United States: A historical perspective. Abacus, 41(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00165.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00167.x

Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., Jr., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.231

Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983). Theft by employees. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2021). Fraud and going concern in an audit of financial statements: Exploring the differences between public perceptions about the role of the auditor and the auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit. Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/publications/fraud-and-going-concern-audit-financial-statements

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2004). International Standard on Auditing 240: The auditor’s responsibility to consider fraud in an audit of financial statements. In IFAC Handbook (2006 ed., pp. 273–317). New York, NY: IFAC.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2016). Corruption: Costs and mitigating strategies (IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/16/05). Retrieved April 11, 2018, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2016/sdn1605.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513594330.006

Moyes, G. D. (2008). CPAs’ perceptions of red flags used in detecting fraud. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5(1), 47–60.

NVivo guide: NVivo manual version 14. (n.d.). QSR International. Retrieved October 2, 2023, from http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-portuguese

Pickett, K. H. (2000). The internal auditing handbook (1st ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

Porter, B. (1997). Auditors’ responsibilities with respect to corporate fraud: A controversial issue. In M. Sherer & S. Turley (Eds.), Current issues in auditing (3rd ed., pp. 31–54). London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219133.n2

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2022). Global survey on fraud and economic crime. Retrieved September 19, 2023, from http://www.pwc.com/

Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00072-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00072-8

Sá, A. L. de. (1982). Fraudes contábeis (1st ed.). São Paulo, Brazil: Ediouro.

Seidman, J. S. (1939). Catching up with employee frauds. The Accounting Review, 14(4), 415–425.

Staub, W. A. (1943). Mode of conducting an audit. The Accounting Review, 18(2), 91–98.

Thomson, S. (2017, January). We waste $2 trillion a year on corruption: Here are four better ways to spend that money. World Economic Forum. Retrieved April 11, 2018, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/we-waste-2-trillion-a-year-on-corruption-here-are-four-better-ways-to-spend-that-money

Wells, J. (2001). Why employees commit fraud. Journal of Accountancy, 191(2), 89–91.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

How to Cite

MOURA, Herval da Silva; DE FARIA, Juliano Almeida; BRITO, Carlos Alberto Oliveira; SILVA, Luiz Ivan dos Santos; SACRAMENTO, Célia Oliveira de Jesus. THE AUDIT OPINION AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR REDUCING THE RISK OF FRAUD IN ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 52, p. e8522, 2025. DOI: 10.56238/levv16n52-082. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/8522. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.