CHALLENGES IN GUIDED SURGERY AND 3D VIRTUAL PLANNING IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

Authors

  • Andres Santiago Quizhpi Lopez Author
  • Geremias Ribeiro de Sousa Author
  • Silas da Silva Crispim Author
  • Geórgia Brandão Olyntho Author
  • Natan Gonçalves Gomes Author
  • Waliston Moreira dos Santos Author
  • Maiara Tomiatti Justulin Author
  • Lucas Rafael Guimarães Pereira Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n55-136

Keywords:

Guided Surgery, 3D Virtual Planning, Orthognathic Surgery, Maxillofacial Trauma, Digital Implantology, 3D Printing

Abstract

The advancement of digital technologies has revolutionized oral and maxillofacial surgery, allowing for more precise diagnoses and 3D virtual surgical planning. This narrative review examines the benefits and challenges of guided surgery and virtual planning, focusing on orthognathic surgery, trauma, orbital reconstruction, and implantology. The literature demonstrates that the integration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intraoral scans and CAD/CAM software significantly improves the accuracy of procedures, with discrepancies between planned and executed results generally clinically acceptable (< 2 mm). However, limitations persist, such as high cost, learning curve, lack of standardization in image registration methods (surface vs. voxel), and functional restrictions in implantology software. The study concludes that, although transformative, these technologies require continuous validation and overcoming technical barriers for their universal application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALKHAYER, Ali et al. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head & Face Medicine, v. 16, n. 34, p. 1-9, 2020.

FLÜGGE, Tabea et al. Digital implantology—a review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery. Part II: Prosthetic set-up and virtual implant planning. BMC Oral Health, v. 22, n. 23, p. 1-11, 2022.

GOKER, Funda et al. Accuracy and clinical evaluation of computer-aided surgery in management of maxillofacial fractures after trauma. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, v. 53, p. 1596-1608, 2025.

HOLTE, Michael Boelstoft; SÆDERUP, Henrik; PINHOLT, Else Marie. Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, v. 51, n. 20210499, p. 1-12, 2022.

SCHREURS, Ruud; KLOP, Cornelis; MAAL, Thomas J.J. Advanced Diagnostics and Three-dimensional Virtual Surgical Planning in Orbital Reconstruction. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, v. 29, p. 79-96, 2021.

YASHAVANTH KUMAR, D. S. et al. Three-dimensional printing in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 13, supl. 1, p. S19-S23, 2022.

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

LOPEZ, Andres Santiago Quizhpi; DE SOUSA, Geremias Ribeiro; CRISPIM, Silas da Silva; OLYNTHO, Geórgia Brandão; GOMES, Natan Gonçalves; DOS SANTOS, Waliston Moreira; JUSTULIN, Maiara Tomiatti; PEREIRA, Lucas Rafael Guimarães. CHALLENGES IN GUIDED SURGERY AND 3D VIRTUAL PLANNING IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY. LUMEN ET VIRTUS, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 55, p. e11449 , 2025. DOI: 10.56238/levv16n55-136. Disponível em: https://periodicos.newsciencepubl.com/LEV/article/view/11449. Acesso em: 29 dec. 2025.