Peer Review

Peer Review Process

Articles submitted to Revista Lumen et Virtus are forwarded for evaluation by two reviewers, who issue opinions regarding the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript for publication. In the event of conflicting evaluations, a third reviewer is appointed to conduct a tie-breaking assessment.

The journal adopts a double-blind peer review system, in which reviewers do not have access to the authors’ identities, and authors are not informed of the reviewers’ identities. This procedure aims to ensure an impartial and unbiased evaluation.

After the issuance of the reviewers’ reports, approved articles are returned to the authors so that they may implement the modifications and adjustments suggested or required by the reviewers. The deadline for submitting the revised version is 15 (fifteen) days, and the new file must be submitted through the same platform.

Once the revisions are submitted and accepted, the article enters the publication queue for inclusion in one of the journal’s volumes.

All information, data, and scientific concepts presented, as well as the accuracy of bibliographic references, are the sole responsibility of the authors. Revista Lumen et Virtus assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies or improper use of the information contained in the articles.